Bowie Bailey writes:
>> What I find a bit strange is that I see in the environment file:
>> PIDFILE="/var/run/spamd.pid"
>>
>> I see in the service file:
>> PIDFile=/var/run/spamd.pid
>>
>> And with the spamd call the pidfile is again set. Two could be removed
>> in my opinion, but that i
On 10/22/2018 5:39 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Bowie Bailey writes:
>
>>
>> The OPTIONS variable in the service file usually comes from reading a file in
>> /etc/sysconfig. Normally, you would edit that file to adjust the options
>> used in the
>> service file.
> That is not on my system.
That
"Bill Cole" writes:
When I run it again I see in the logging:
Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection
from localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: setuid to
imaps succeeded
Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.n
"Bill Cole" writes:
>> When I run it again I see in the logging:
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection
>> from localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: setuid to
>> imaps succeeded
>> Oct 22 16:47:15
On 22 Oct 2018, at 11:08, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
"Bill Cole" writes:
On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
(EX_IOERR: IO error).
This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
spamd.
Is sp
Bowie Bailey writes:
> On 10/22/2018 11:08 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>
>> I should have looked into the logs. :'-(
>>
>> When I run it again I see in the logging:
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection from
>> localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
>> Oct
On 10/22/2018 11:08 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> I should have looked into the logs. :'-(
>
> When I run it again I see in the logging:
> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection from
> localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spa
"Bill Cole" writes:
> On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
>> (EX_IOERR: IO error).
>
> This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
> spamd.
>
> Is spamd running?
Yes, spamd is running.
On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
(EX_IOERR: IO error).
This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
spamd.
Is spamd running?
Is spamd listening on the socket that spamc is trying to co
