Matt Hampton wrote:
http://www.coders.co.uk/slipped.through.txt
It has sailed through both a SA3.1.8 and SA3.2.0 (3.2.0-pre2-r512851)
running on recent versions of MailScanner
cheers
Matt
Thanks to everyone who replied - I'll look and the Clam signatures
matt
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Rick Cooper wrote:
> From: Rick Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'SpamAssassin'
> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:04:57 -0400
> Subject: RE: Does anyone catch this
...
> I just sent Steve an updated script that accommodates the trailing
>
Rick Cooper schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Haegele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:30 AM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Does anyone catch this
Dennis Davis schrieb:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Duncan Hill wrote:
From: Duncan Hill <[EMAIL PROTEC
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Haegele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:30 AM
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: Re: Does anyone catch this
>
> Dennis Davis schrieb:
> > On Mon, 14 May 2007, Duncan Hill wrote:
> >
> &g
Dennis Davis schrieb:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Duncan Hill wrote:
From: Duncan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:41:24 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Does anyone catch this
On Mon, May 14, 2007 11:32, Matt Hampton wrote:
http://www.coders
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Duncan Hill wrote:
> From: Duncan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:41:24 +0100 (BST)
> Subject: Re: Does anyone catch this
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 11:32, Matt Hampton wrote:
>
On Mon, May 14, 2007 11:32, Matt Hampton wrote:
> http://www.coders.co.uk/slipped.through.txt
>
>
> It has sailed through both a SA3.1.8 and SA3.2.0 (3.2.0-pre2-r512851)
> running on recent versions of MailScanner
The ClamAV engine tends to work well on a large number of that type of
phish. Local
