Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-16 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Linda Walsh wrote: John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, SM wrote: > At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote: > > How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be > > useful to assign a probability to "Trust" at the least. I mean do I > > put > > my

Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-16 Thread Linda Walsh
John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, SM wrote: At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote: How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be useful to assign a probability to "Trust" at the least. I mean do I put my ISP in my trusted server list? -- suppose they start partner

Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-12 Thread SM
Hi John, At 13:07 12-06-2008, John Hardin wrote: That's not the "what" that you're measuring with the probability factor, that's the "how" you're measuring it. Right. It's been a long day. I'll refrain from elaborating or else I'll say another blunder. :-) Was the OP _not_ talking about "t

Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-12 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, SM wrote: At 10:22 12-06-2008, John Hardin wrote: Probability of what, exactly? It can be a probability based on historical data of the sender or an arbitrary score. That's not the "what" that you're measuring with the probability factor, that's the "how" you're measu

Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-12 Thread SM
At 10:22 12-06-2008, John Hardin wrote: Probability of what, exactly? It can be a probability based on historical data of the sender or an arbitrary score. Bear in mind, "trusted" means "does not forge Received: headers", not "does not send or relay spam". My answer was more about levels

Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-12 Thread mouss
Linda Walsh wrote: Matthias Leisi wrote: 1) This advice: | Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not | configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks manually should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly reduce the number of DNS lo

Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-12 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, SM wrote: At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote: How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be useful to assign a probability to "Trust" at the least. I mean do I put my ISP in my trusted server list? -- suppose they start partnering with It could be

Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-12 Thread Alex Woick
Linda Walsh schrieb am 12.06.2008 02:46: 1) This advice: | Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not | configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks manually How does one decided on 'trust'? For trusted_network in SpamAssassin, the definiti

Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Matthias Leisi wrote: > >1) This advice: > >| Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not > >| configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks > >manually > > > >should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly reduce > >the number of DNS l

Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-11 Thread SM
At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote: How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be useful to assign a probability to "Trust" at the least. I mean do I put my ISP in my trusted server list? -- suppose they start partnering with It could be a reputation system where you ass