David B Funk wrote:
> Kind'a hard to add TXT records to the .in-addr.arpa zone. Maybe it's
> possible
> but I've never seen it.
It's entirely possible to put any type of record in a .in-addr.arpa
zone. It doesn't often make much *sense*, but it's legal syntax; a DNS
zone is a DNS zone.
-kgd, th
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, @lbutlr wrote:
On Jul 15, 2015, at 6:53 PM, Jeremiah Rothschild wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 07:42:15PM -0500, David B Funk wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Jeremiah Rothschild wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to trigger SPF_FAIL (or SPF_HELO_FAIL) on a CentOS 6.6 box
runn
Jeremiah Rothschild skrev den 2015-07-16 02:53:
Ah. I didn't realize HELO had to be FQDN. Nice catch, David. Thanks!
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_helo_name
if using postfix, if its [127.0.0.1] as helo name postfix will accept
it, but reject 127.0.0.1
> On Jul 15, 2015, at 6:53 PM, Jeremiah Rothschild wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 07:42:15PM -0500, David B Funk wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Jeremiah Rothschild wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am attempting to trigger SPF_FAIL (or SPF_HELO_FAIL) on a CentOS 6.6 box
>>> running SA 3.3.1-3
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 07:42:15PM -0500, David B Funk wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Jeremiah Rothschild wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I am attempting to trigger SPF_FAIL (or SPF_HELO_FAIL) on a CentOS 6.6 box
> >running SA 3.3.1-3. Upon funneling a message through SA, however, this is
> >what is occu
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Jeremiah Rothschild wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to trigger SPF_FAIL (or SPF_HELO_FAIL) on a CentOS 6.6 box
running SA 3.3.1-3. Upon funneling a message through SA, however, this is
what is occurring:
Jul 15 15:05:10.366 [7318] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=1.2.3.4,
ip=5.
