On Wednesday 07 February 2007 15:57, Sebastian Ries wrote:
> I see that it's checked. That's why I typed "not REALLY checked" ;-)
>
> > It could be related to the locations of your rulesets
> > It could be related to the user you run SA/Spamd as
> > It could be related to the way you pipe the mail
Hi
> > > looks like the mail is not really checked...
>
> It is checked, you can tell from the fact that spamd has logged it.
I see that it's checked. That's why I typed "not REALLY checked" ;-)
> It could be related to the locations of your rulesets
> It could be related to the user you run SA/
Hi
> http://www.backports.org/backports.org/pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassi
>n_3.1.7-1~bpo.1.diff.gz
>
> That's the difference. :-)
LOL
> AFAICT, the Debian package merely adds an init script,
I did this manually
> changes /etc/mail/spamassassin to /etc/spamassassin, adds some
I don't care w
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 13:49, Sebastian Ries wrote:
> We have several instacnes of spamassassin running.
>
> Most of them are installed as Debian packages. When I upgrade these from
> sarge-backports to version 3.1.7 and run sa-update I get about 95% of Spam
> detected.
>
> Another instance is
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 15:01, Sebastian Ries wrote:
> Hi
>
> > What I see is that there are many mails are rated with 0:
> > Feb 6 15:10:24 gatekeeper spamd[30092]: spamd: clean message
> > (0.0/5.0) for spamfilter:511 in 4.6 seconds, 2524 bytes.
> > Feb 6 15:10:24 gatekeeper spamd[30092]:
Hi
> What I see is that there are many mails are rated with 0:
> Feb 6 15:10:24 gatekeeper spamd[30092]: spamd: clean message (0.0/5.0) for
> spamfilter:511 in 4.6 seconds, 2524 bytes.
> Feb 6 15:10:24 gatekeeper spamd[30092]: spamd: result: . 0 -
> scantime=4.6,size=2524,user=spamfilter,uid=511
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 13:49, Sebastian Ries wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have several instacnes of spamassassin running.
>
> Most of them are installed as Debian packages. When I upgrade these from
> sarge-backports to version 3.1.7 and run sa-update I get about 95% of Spam
> detected.
>
> Another inst
