On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Alex wrote:
...
> I did notice this one header discrepancy:
>
> Received: by mail.mydomain.net (Postfix, from userid 78)
>
> What's with the "Postfix, from user 78)"? This should be the server's
> IP address, no?
That header is normal when you're using a "simple"
Hi,
>> > Forgot to mention: After running sa-update WRT 3.2.
>>
>> Great, thanks so much.
>
> Well, you *did* run sa-update since then, no? I mean, at the very least
> early this year. Begs the question, why you still do have that rule.
It's another system that I just adopted, and haven't finishe
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:51 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > > Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules since domain is cybersquatted.
> > >
> > > The rule has been removed a *year* ago, and is neither part of 3.3, nor
> > > 3.2 stock rules.
> >
> > Forgot to mention: After running sa-update WRT 3.2.
>
>
>> Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules since domain is cybersquatted.
>>
>> The rule has been removed a *year* ago, and is neither part of 3.3, nor
>> 3.2 stock rules.
>
> Forgot to mention: After running sa-update WRT 3.2.
Great, thanks so much.
Best,
Alex
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:24 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:58 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > How does DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS work? I have a system where every message
> > triggers on DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and I can't figure out why.
>
> Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules sinc
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:58 -0400, Alex wrote:
> How does DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS work? I have a system where every message
> triggers on DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and I can't figure out why.
Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules since domain is cybersquatted.
The rule has been removed a *year* ago, and
