Re: DNSWL was re-enabled

2011-12-26 Thread darxus
On 12/26, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > score __RCVD_IN_DNSWL 0 > > It is a non-scoring "double underscore" sub-rule. It does not have a > score. It cannot have a score. Setting its score to zero does nothing, > and certainly not prevent the DNS query. > > Instead, you need to meta out the rule,

Re: DNSWL was re-enabled

2011-12-26 Thread Henrik K
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:39:45PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > score __RCVD_IN_DNSWL 0 > > It is a non-scoring "double underscore" sub-rule. It does not have a > score. It cannot have a score. Setting its score to zero does nothing, > and certainly not prevent the DNS query. Surprise, i

Re: DNSWL was re-enabled

2011-12-26 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
> score __RCVD_IN_DNSWL 0 It is a non-scoring "double underscore" sub-rule. It does not have a score. It cannot have a score. Setting its score to zero does nothing, and certainly not prevent the DNS query. Instead, you need to meta out the rule, overwriting the rule definition. And frankly, dis