On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:14:11AM +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote:
>
> Andrzej Adam Filip schrieb:
>
> >> Speaking of which, it may actually make sense to use all of
> >> dnswl.org's entries as trusted_networks-entries...
> >
> > Do you want it even for DNSWL trust levels of "none" and "low"?
> > I
Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip schrieb:
>
>>> Speaking of which, it may actually make sense to use all of
>>> dnswl.org's entries as trusted_networks-entries...
>>
>> Do you want it even for DNSWL trust levels of "none" and "low"?
>> It would be a "brave" suggestion :-)
>
> Surprisin
Andrzej Adam Filip schrieb:
>> Speaking of which, it may actually make sense to use all of
>> dnswl.org's entries as trusted_networks-entries...
>
> Do you want it even for DNSWL trust levels of "none" and "low"?
> It would be a "brave" suggestion :-)
Surprisingly, I *am* suggesting to do exact