Re: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-23 Thread Matt Kettler
Michael Scheidell wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 11:21 AM >> To: Michael Scheidell >> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Subject: Re: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins >>

RE: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 11:21 AM > To: Michael Scheidell > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins > > > Looking at the messages, apparently verizon

Re: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-22 Thread Matt Kettler
Michael Scheidell wrote: > Ok, seems to work now, not sure why it wasn't. > > Thanks all. > Not sure why it wasn't either. However, the test message I sent you, and CCed to my verizon address, failed. but a copy sent back to my own yahoo account passed. Looking at the messages, apparently veri

RE: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-22 Thread Michael Scheidell
Ok, seems to work now, not sure why it wasn't. Thanks all. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO SECNAP Network Security Corporation Keep up to date with latest information on IT security: Real time security alerts: http://www.secnap.com/news

Re: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-21 Thread Bill Landry
Michael Scheidell wrote the following on 7/21/2007 10:07 AM -0800: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:38 PM >> To: Michael Scheidell >> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org >>

RE: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:38 PM > To: Michael Scheidell > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins > > However, AFAIK, the DKIM versions of the rul

Re: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-20 Thread Matt Kettler
Michael Scheidell wrote: > Matt Kettler wrote: >> >> Michael Scheidell wrote: >> > SA 3.2.1 INSTALL seems to indicate that if I use Mail-DKIM .20 or >> > better, I don't need Mail-DomainKeys. >> > >> > > I loaded Mail-DomainKeys perl libraries and will be doing some testing > to see if I can see wh

Re: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-20 Thread Michael Scheidell
Matt Kettler wrote: Michael Scheidell wrote: > SA 3.2.1 INSTALL seems to indicate that if I use Mail-DKIM .20 or > better, I don't need Mail-DomainKeys. > I loaded Mail-DomainKeys perl libraries and will be doing some testing to see if I can see what and why, and will post it later. ( have u

Re: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-20 Thread Matt Kettler
Michael Scheidell wrote: > SA 3.2.1 INSTALL seems to indicate that if I use Mail-DKIM .20 or > better, I don't need Mail-DomainKeys. > > Because of this, I removed the Mail-DomainKeys dependency from the > FreeBsd SA port (I am the official maintainer) > > I have seen a couple of issues that indica