Re: Checking Rules

2010-02-22 Thread Kevin Parris
It "applies" all the rules, in the sense of testing each message for each condition. If a message matches the conditions of a rule then that is considered a "hit" on that rule. Rules that "hit" on a message are listed in the report. Messages that appear, to the human observer, to be very similar

Re: Checking Rules

2010-02-22 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 22.02.10 13:02, Personal Técnico wrote: > I would like to know how SA determines what rules are aplied while > scanning a mail and what rules not, only rules that have non-zero score are checked. > because I have received two mails > with similar body but applied rules were different. it

Re: Checking Rules

2010-02-22 Thread RW
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:14:08 + Kevin Golding wrote: > In article <4b827244.2060...@caos.uab.es>, Personal Técnico > writes > >Another question: is there any way for configuring SA for getting a > >detailed score of rules in a mail when "X-Spam-Status: No". By > >default, SA does a detailed

Re: Checking Rules

2010-02-22 Thread Kevin Golding
In article <4b827244.2060...@caos.uab.es>, Personal Técnico writes >Another question: is there any way for configuring SA for getting a >detailed score of rules in a mail when "X-Spam-Status: No". By default, >SA does a detailed score when mail is marked as SPAM, but not in HAM cases. add_heade