On 10/31/2014 01:30 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/31/2014 2:56 AM, Axb wrote:
On 10/30/2014 11:32 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/29/2014 5:17 PM, Axb wrote:
Ok so it looks like it's committed in rules/60_whitelist.cf which
should
go out in tonight's rule update if all goes according to
On 10/31/2014 2:56 AM, Axb wrote:
On 10/30/2014 11:32 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/29/2014 5:17 PM, Axb wrote:
Ok so it looks like it's committed in rules/60_whitelist.cf which
should
go out in tonight's rule update if all goes according to plan, yes?
Yep... if all goes according to pla
On 10/30/2014 11:32 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/29/2014 5:17 PM, Axb wrote:
Ok so it looks like it's committed in rules/60_whitelist.cf which should
go out in tonight's rule update if all goes according to plan, yes?
Yep... if all goes according to plan.. :)
So I'm not sure if you have
On 10/29/2014 5:17 PM, Axb wrote:
Ok so it looks like it's committed in rules/60_whitelist.cf which should
go out in tonight's rule update if all goes according to plan, yes?
Yep... if all goes according to plan.. :)
So I'm not sure if you have fixed it since because I pulled down the
latest
On 10/29/2014 10:09 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/28/2014 7:24 PM, Axb wrote:
On 10/29/2014 12:23 AM, Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: Axb
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:39 +0100
before I commit please test with
describe HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST Whitelisted header host or domain
On 10/28/2014 7:24 PM, Axb wrote:
On 10/29/2014 12:23 AM, Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: Axb
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:39 +0100
before I commit please test with
describe HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST Whitelisted header host or domain
describe HEADER_HOST_IN_WHITELIST Blacklisted
On 10/29/2014 12:23 AM, Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: Axb
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:39 +0100
before I commit please test with
describe HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST Whitelisted header host or domain
describe HEADER_HOST_IN_WHITELIST Blacklisted header host or domain
These two ar
On 10/28/2014 10:30 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/28/2014 5:19 PM, Axb wrote:
On 10/28/2014 10:13 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/28/2014 12:06 PM, Axb wrote:
Patience quota exceeded.
What a weird way to get a new TLD's ROI
if (version >= 3.004000)
blacklist_uri_host link
endif
So w
On 10/28/2014 11:28 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:16 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 6:06 PM +0100 Axb
wrote:
Patience quota exceeded.
What a weird way to get a new TLD's ROI
if (version >= 3.004000)
blacklist_uri_hos
--On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:16 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 6:06 PM +0100 Axb
wrote:
Patience quota exceeded.
What a weird way to get a new TLD's ROI
if (version >= 3.004000)
blacklist_uri_host link
endif
Testing this on my MTA's now...
Do
On 10/28/2014 11:16 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 6:06 PM +0100 Axb
wrote:
Patience quota exceeded.
What a weird way to get a new TLD's ROI
if (version >= 3.004000)
blacklist_uri_host link
endif
Testing this on my MTA's now...
Not sure what is broken, d
--On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 6:06 PM +0100 Axb
wrote:
Patience quota exceeded.
What a weird way to get a new TLD's ROI
if (version >= 3.004000)
blacklist_uri_host link
endif
Testing this on my MTA's now...
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
On 10/28/2014 10:30 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/28/2014 5:19 PM, Axb wrote:
On 10/28/2014 10:13 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/28/2014 12:06 PM, Axb wrote:
Patience quota exceeded.
What a weird way to get a new TLD's ROI
if (version >= 3.004000)
blacklist_uri_host link
endif
So w
On 10/28/2014 5:19 PM, Axb wrote:
On 10/28/2014 10:13 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/28/2014 12:06 PM, Axb wrote:
Patience quota exceeded.
What a weird way to get a new TLD's ROI
if (version >= 3.004000)
blacklist_uri_host link
endif
So we added this wanting to play with this command an
On 10/28/2014 10:13 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/28/2014 12:06 PM, Axb wrote:
Patience quota exceeded.
What a weird way to get a new TLD's ROI
if (version >= 3.004000)
blacklist_uri_host link
endif
So we added this wanting to play with this command and had no change in
behavior for an
On 10/28/2014 12:06 PM, Axb wrote:
Patience quota exceeded.
What a weird way to get a new TLD's ROI
if (version >= 3.004000)
blacklist_uri_host link
endif
So we added this wanting to play with this command and had no change in
behavior for an email with this from header:
From: "Notificatio
16 matches
Mail list logo