RE: bonded sender

So I guess I will put a complaint in -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:46 AM To: Jean-Paul Natola; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: bonded sender At 10:07 PM 11/30/2005, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: >I was j

Re: bonded sender

From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 10:07 PM 11/30/2005, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: I was just curious ( as it's the first time I came across this) As to how this can be -4.3 RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTEDRBL: Sender is in Bonded Sender Program (trusted relay) [IronPort Bonded

Re: bonded sender

At 10:07 PM 11/30/2005, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: I was just curious ( as it's the first time I came across this) As to how this can be -4.3 RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTEDRBL: Sender is in Bonded Sender Program (trusted relay) [IronPort Bonded Sender - ] O

Re: Bonded Sender

From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Most people having problems with BSP are in category 2, or consider subscriber mail to be spam. (There is a lot of spam-ish subscriber mail out there, my users subscribe to lots of it, on purpose, it's often hard for me to tell without asking the recipi

Re: Bonded Sender

First thing I do whenever do an upgrade of SA is to go through and zero out any rules that suppose someone is a good player. I don't believe in someone being able to pay to send my system spam. Any such whitelist systems will eventually be abused IMO. Spammers look at SA rules and take the easiest

Re: Bonded Sender

> >Be aware though that MANY spammers forge bonded sender tags. If you have > >one of the older methods of checking bonded sender, it is very probable that > >a lot of your failures are forgeries that the newer bonded sender methods > >should correctly detect. > > Erm, you're thinking of HABEAS SW

Re: Bonded Sender

At 10:18 AM 8/15/2005, Loren Wilton wrote: My very minimal experience with Bonded Sender is that the people who contract directly are mostly fairly legit. The people who contract through the clever guilt-sharing arrangement at constant contact are spammers. Agreed. Be aware though that MANY

Re: Bonded Sender

My very minimal experience with Bonded Sender is that the people who contract directly are mostly fairly legit. The people who contract through the clever guilt-sharing arrangement at constant contact are spammers. Be aware though that MANY spammers forge bonded sender tags. If you have one of t

Re: Bonded Sender

Russ Uhte wrote: We're moving away from our current antispam setup which uses the bonded sender list. In doing some checking to see how I want to setup SA, I noticed that currently many messages that look like spam are being whitelisted by our current setup because of the bonded sender list.