OK, i updated it with cpan after uninstalling.
But i had to change something in amavis-new, according to:
http://o-o-s.de/?p=2735
And now my sa-config is in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
Before, it was one level higher, which is really not important.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.n
On 17/09/10 11:21, franc wrote:
In that case, uninstalling Spamassassin from Apt (and then doing an
apt-get --autoremove to clear out Perl libs installed through apt/dpkg)
and re-installing with CPAN should be fine, and you'll be able to keep
it up to date.
I use aptitude, is this the
στις 17/09/2010 12:55 μμ, O/H Dominic Benson έγραψε:
On 17/09/10 10:42, franc wrote:
I doubt if this is possible on a VPS. At least the kernel is not
changeable
because coming from the host and is old enough (2.6.9). I guess an
update to
Lucid Lynx (10.04) will be if not unpossible but problem
> In that case, uninstalling Spamassassin from Apt (and then doing an
> apt-get --autoremove to clear out Perl libs installed through apt/dpkg)
> and re-installing with CPAN should be fine, and you'll be able to keep
> it up to date.
I use aptitude, is this the same then? Will this uninstall a
On 17/09/10 10:42, franc wrote:
I doubt if this is possible on a VPS. At least the kernel is not changeable
because coming from the host and is old enough (2.6.9). I guess an update to
Lucid Lynx (10.04) will be if not unpossible but problematic.
So if i use CPAN and keep my Hardy Heron, there w
>
> If you can, upgrade to Lucid. If you can't - and don't ever plan to
> upgrade the machine to a later Ubuntu release - then you could uninstall
> and then install via CPAN, but I would fairly strongly recommend against
> doing that if you have any intention of upgrading it in the future. In
This is just what i noticed: there is no Ubuntu package update after the
3.2.4-ubu1 related to:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/de/hardy/spamassassin
But how then to update? Can i use a package for Ubuntu Maverick (10.10) or
is this the absolute wrong way?
If you add hardy-backports to your a
Hi , in you sources.list you have 2 lines
#deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-backports main restricted
universe multiverse
#deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-backports main
restricted universe multiverse
Uncomment that lines and try to
apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
On tor 16 sep 2010 23:19:34 CEST, franc wrote
OK, i put now till i am sure there is no more FP the threshold on -, 5, 10,
15 so between 5 and 10 it is delivered into the spam-folder, and with 10 it
is bounced.
rejected please, eg dont accept and bouce
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-t
Hi , in you sources.list you have 2 lines
#deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-backports main restricted
universe multiverse
#deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-backports main
restricted universe multiverse
Uncomment that lines and try to
apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
The next thing i just discovered is:
$final_bad_header_destiny = D_PASS;
with this rule, each Subject, containing 8-Bit, is sent to the quarantine
folder.
I didn't know this and now i am discovering many emails in the quarantine
which were no spam at all :-)
I commented it out:
# $final_bad_h
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:10 -0700, franc wrote:
> > I seriously hope you just mis-worded that. Bounce!? That would be after
> > *accepting* a message, and with spam generally will be bounced to a
> > forged, innocent bystander -- not the spammer. So please, tell me you
> > actually meant to say REJ
> I seriously hope you just mis-worded that. Bounce!? That would be after
> *accepting* a message, and with spam generally will be bounced to a
> forged, innocent bystander -- not the spammer. So please, tell me you
> actually meant to say REJECT. That is, not accept by the MX.
No, i didn't know
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 14:19 -0700, franc wrote:
> OK, i put now till i am sure there is no more FP the threshold on -, 5, 10,
> 15 so between 5 and 10 it is delivered into the spam-folder, and with 10 it
> is bounced.
>
> I think after a while i will know if i can put 2,5,6.31,10 or something like
OK, i put now till i am sure there is no more FP the threshold on -, 5, 10,
15 so between 5 and 10 it is delivered into the spam-folder, and with 10 it
is bounced.
I think after a while i will know if i can put 2,5,6.31,10 or something like
this.
Thank you for the hints!
--
View this message in
On tor 16 sep 2010 20:37:07 CEST, franc wrote
yes, spamassassin is the only thing to upgrade at the moment.
I am running Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (Hardy Heron) and i installed spamassassin with
aptitude.
then i will suggest to try here
https://launchpad.net/hardy-backports
make a request for upgrade a
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 11:32 -0700, franc wrote:
> > ... Do you train *both*, spam *and* ham? Any chance these
> > have been trained incorrectly before? What Bayes score do they actually
> > get? The X-Spam-Status header would be sufficient to see.
> >
> > The few lines of 'sa-learn --dump magic' w
> You're probably too late, Matus: you've got into his trash folder... ;)
> From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
> > > What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
> > > chronometer...
--^
haha, this one is good!
:-)
But anyway, i didn't put an "i" t
> are spamassassin the only thing you like to upgrade ?
>
> what os are you running ?, and what package managedment rpm ?, cpan ?,
> lastly dont mix cpan with rpm
yes, spamassassin is the only thing to upgrade at the moment.
I am running Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (Hardy Heron) and i installed spamassass
> ... Do you train *both*, spam *and* ham? Any chance these
> have been trained incorrectly before? What Bayes score do they actually
> get? The X-Spam-Status header would be sufficient to see.
>
> The few lines of 'sa-learn --dump magic' would be good, too. Oh, and you
> are training Bayes as th
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 03:26 -0700, Franc Walter(?) wrote:
> > SA goes farther than your simple idea. Have a look at how Bayes works, and
> > all the available SA plugins.
>
> I trained SA since months with all those chronometer-zeitmesser-spam and
> only 5% is now set to spam.
> I want to get rid
On tor 16 sep 2010 18:08:46 CEST, franc wrote
http://packages.ubuntu.com/de/hardy/spamassassin
But how then to update? Can i use a package for Ubuntu Maverick (10.10) or
is this the absolute wrong way?
ask a ubuntu maintainer, make a request for this in lunchpad seems to
me next step
if yo
On tor 16 sep 2010 17:47:12 CEST, franc wrote
But before you go trying to play whack-a-mole
with lists of poison-pill words (and deal with the FPs that result), you
should try upgrading to the latest release.
I would like to update spamassassin, but how?
42, na not this time, tell more on h
On tor 16 sep 2010 17:41:05 CEST, John Hardin wrote
that result), you should try upgrading to the latest release. 3.2.4
is several years stale and is not getting any rule updates. Its
performance _will_ deteriorate over time as the nature of spam
changes.
agree, but if the host os still h
On tor 16 sep 2010 13:59:39 CEST, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote
want to get rid of it immediately.
Well, you may try putting this into /etc/spamassassin/local.cf, then:
describe FORBWORDS Matches some forbidden words (dangerous)
body __FORBWORDS /\W(?:viagra|chronometer|zeitmesser)/i
> Unfortunately Canonical probably is _not_ going to provide official SA
> 3.3.x packages for Ubuntu 8.x...
This is just what i noticed: there is no Ubuntu package update after the
3.2.4-ubu1 related to:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/de/hardy/spamassassin
But how then to update? Can i use a packa
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, franc wrote:
But before you go trying to play whack-a-mole with lists of poison-pill
words (and deal with the FPs that result), you should try upgrading to
the latest release.
I would like to update spamassassin, but how?
The rule for reliability is "update the way you
> But before you go trying to play whack-a-mole
> with lists of poison-pill words (and deal with the FPs that result), you
> should try upgrading to the latest release.
I would like to update spamassassin, but how?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Blacklist-for-spam-wo
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, franc wrote:
i don't know spamassassin not very well, i am using 3.2.4 on Ubuntu 8.04
LTS.
I need a textfile where i can put in blacklist-words like "Viagra",
"Chronometer", "Zeitmesser" and so on, if an email has one of this
words, this email should directly put to the
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, franc wrote:
I need a textfile where i can put in blacklist-words like "Viagra",
"Chronometer", "Zeitmesser" and so on, if an email has one of this
words, this email should directly put to the "Spam"-folder.
Are you sure you want to embark in a project like that and will
You're probably too late, Matus: you've got into his trash folder... ;)
> From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
> > > What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
> > > chronometer...
--^
> > This is very unlikely because i have none. So even if he aske
> > What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
> > chronometer...
>
> This is very unlikely because i have none. So even if he asked, it were in
> vain :-)
>
> > SA goes farther than your simple idea. Have a look at how Bayes works, and
> > all the available SA plugins.
On
> > SA goes farther than your simple idea. Have a look at how Bayes
> works, and
> > all the available SA plugins.
>
> I trained SA since months with all those chronometer-zeitmesser-spam
> and
> only 5% is now set to spam.
> I want to get rid of it immediately.
Well, you may try putting this int
franc wrote:
>
>> You may setup a regexp rule in the /etc/local.cf file of your SA
>> installation
>
> Could you give me an example, or where to find one? In the local.cf i
> don't find RegExp-sections.
body FRANCS_RULE /regexp/
/Per Jessen, Zürich
On 2010-09-16 12:29, franc wrote:
You may setup a regexp rule in the /etc/local.cf file of your SA
installation
Could you give me an example, or where to find one? In the local.cf i don't
find RegExp-sections.
see http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules
> You may setup a regexp rule in the /etc/local.cf file of your SA
> installation
Could you give me an example, or where to find one? In the local.cf i don't
find RegExp-sections.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Blacklist-for-spam-words-tp29726548p29726801.html
Sent from
>
> What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
> chronometer...
This is very unlikely because i have none. So even if he asked, it were in
vain :-)
> SA goes farther than your simple idea. Have a look at how Bayes works, and
> all the available SA plugins.
I trained SA s
> You may setup a regexp rule in the /etc/local.cf file of your SA
> installation, but a simple rule like the one you suggest may easily yield
> FPs (False Positives, ie: non-spam messages may get into your trashcan).
>
> What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
> chronomet
> Hello,
>
> i don't know spamassassin not very well, i am using 3.2.4 on Ubuntu
> 8.04
> LTS.
>
> I need a textfile where i can put in blacklist-words like "Viagra",
> "Chronometer", "Zeitmesser" and so on, if an email has one of this
> words,
> this email should directly put to the "Spam"-folde
39 matches
Mail list logo
