Hello Phil,
Sunday, May 28, 2006, 11:20:05 AM, you wrote:
PS> Hi there,
PS> So I searched (a lot) for solutions. I only found this one in the SA rules :
PS> SARE_TOCC_BCC_MANY
PS> in the 70_SARE_header0.cf file.
PS> By default, the score is set to 0...
PS> Then I looked at the SARE file.
PS> Th
Phil (Sphinx) wrote on Sun, 28 May 2006 20:49:41 +0200:
> I don't think they do not appear... because when I test it myself, with
> the SARE Bcc rule, it seems to work :
The bcc is either stripped out or ignored by an MTA if it is in the header
of a mail because it is useless there and can comp
On 5/28/06, Phil (Sphinx) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really don't understand.
I haven't attempted to figure out what the SARE rule is doing, I'm afraid.
Do you think I should ask the exim-users list ?
If the goal is to limit the volume of mail that any particular user
can cause to be del
Hi,
Thanks for the quick answer.
Bart Schaefer a écrit :
On 5/28/06, Phil (Sphinx) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also tried to set up my own rule : header NETW_BCC_MANY ^Bcc =~
/,.*,.*,/
The Bcc header is stripped out by the transport system, so you can't
compare on it directly.
Yes, I've
On 5/28/06, Phil (Sphinx) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also tried to set up my own rule :
header NETW_BCC_MANY ^Bcc =~ /,.*,.*,/
The Bcc header is stripped out by the transport system, so you can't
compare on it directly. What you have to discover is whether there
are a lot of recipients in t
