Re: Bemused by difference between spamassassin and spamc...

2007-05-26 Thread Steve
Matt Kettler wrote: > Interesting.. What parameters are being passed to spamd on startup? > Any chance there's a --siteconfigpath option in there? I'm using a vanilla gentoo install for the start scripts... I changed "-m 5" for "-m 1" because I don't have much RAM and I'm happy for messages to wait

Re: Bemused by difference between spamassassin and spamc...

2007-05-26 Thread Matt Kettler
Steve wrote: > Matt Kettler wrote: > >> Did you restart spamd after adding the ZMIde_* rules? >> >> Spamd won't re-parse files in /etc/mail/spamassassin. >> >> > I hadn't just added the ZMIde_* rules - but, just to be sure, I checked: > > > I don't think that explains things... > Also

Re: Bemused by difference between spamassassin and spamc...

2007-05-26 Thread Matt Kettler
Steve wrote: > Matt Kettler wrote: > >> Did you restart spamd after adding the ZMIde_* rules? >> >> Spamd won't re-parse files in /etc/mail/spamassassin. >> >> > I hadn't just added the ZMIde_* rules - but, just to be sure, I checked: > > -- > $ su > Password: > # /etc/init.d/spamd resta

Re: Bemused by difference between spamassassin and spamc...

2007-05-26 Thread Steve
Matt Kettler wrote: > Did you restart spamd after adding the ZMIde_* rules? > > Spamd won't re-parse files in /etc/mail/spamassassin. > I hadn't just added the ZMIde_* rules - but, just to be sure, I checked: -- $ su Password: # /etc/init.d/spamd restart * Stopping spamd ...

Re: Bemused by difference between spamassassin and spamc...

2007-05-26 Thread Matt Kettler
Steve wrote: > N.B. IMAGESHACK_URI is a rule of my own... What I want to know is why > does spamassassin match with the ZMIde_* rules - whereas spamc doesn't. > I'm using gentoo and have installed spamassassin 3.1.8 and RulesDuJour. > I've run sa-update. > > -- > $ spamassassin < spkeluation.eml