El 13/07/10 17:22, Giampaolo Tomassoni escribió:
I don't think that's going to help - it's not going to tell us why
it's blacklisted.
Also I suspect those headers aren't added by SA alone. AFAIK
BLACKLISTED isn't added by SA like that - blacklist rule should show up
in tests=[], which is empty.
> I don't think that's going to help - it's not going to tell us why
> it's blacklisted.
>
> Also I suspect those headers aren't added by SA alone. AFAIK
> BLACKLISTED isn't added by SA like that - blacklist rule should show up
> in tests=[], which is empty. And the score isn't consistent 64 and
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Daniel Lemke wrote:
>
>
> Angel Mateo wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a mail that always is marked as spam. The only
> > information I get is:
> >
> > X-Spam-Flag: YES
> > X-Spam-Score: 64
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > **
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:14 +0200, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> I have a mail that always is marked as spam. The only information I get is:
>
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Score: 64
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=-5 tagged_abov
Angel Mateo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a mail that always is marked as spam. The only information I get
> is:
>
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Score: 64
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=-5 tagged_above=-4 requi
