orth; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Avoiding Bayes Poison
>
> Martin, not sure how/what pastebin. Sorry. Here it is zipped though.
>
> Instructions to pastebin?
>
> Thanks,
> Clay
>
> >>> On 1/11/2007 at 10:52 AM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED
sorry for some bounces
this mail hit
clamav with > Email.Spam.Gen023.Sanesecurity.06121101
and got blocked by my dnsbl script
140.211.11.2 is now on my whitelist :)
Matthias
Clay Davis schrieb:
No its all kinda like the attached.
C
>>> On 1/11/2007 at 10:03 AM, in message
<[EMAIL P
Clay Davis wrote:
Thanks, Michel. How do you correct? Run it back through as ham?
C
All my user accounts have system-created "ConfirmedSpam" and "ConfirmedNotSpam"
folders. If the SA system makes a mistake, they just drag-and-drop the email into the right folder. Every
night, the
44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Clay Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 January 2007 15:44
> To: Martin.Hepworth; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Avoiding Bayes Poison
>
> No its all kinda like the attached.
> C
>
> >&
Thanks, Michel. How do you correct? Run it back through as ham?
C
>>> On 1/11/2007 at 10:32 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michel R Vaillancourt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clay Davis wrote:
> Over the past several months I have been saving the spam that slips
> through to my users accounts
No its all kinda like the attached.
C
>>> On 1/11/2007 at 10:03 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Martin.Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clay
This spam hasn't got a nice image in it with the actual spam message
in
it has it??
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Clay Davis wrote:
Over the past several months I have been saving the spam that slips
through to my users accounts to train my bayes with. I notice that
lately almost all of it has (what I am assuming to be) an attempt to
poison my bayes (a bunch of valid words put together in a nonsensical
p
Clay
This spam hasn't got a nice image in it with the actual spam message in
it has it??
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Clay Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 January 2007 14:58
> To: users@spam
Well if you are learning it as spam and not ham then it will push up
the probablity of the words contained in the spam. So mail with those
words is most likely to be affected with Bayes. so you may want to
reduce the score of the bayes rules if you think they are not going to
be accurate. Or start
