|-Original Message-
|From: Moussa Fall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 04 November 2004 13:07
|To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
|Subject: Re: Automatic rejection
|
|OK, now I have spamassassin, clamav, amavisd-new installed
|with my RH9 and postfix. They all seem to work fine together
-Original Message-
From: Moussa Fall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:07 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Automatic rejection
OK, now I have spamassassin, clamav, amavisd-new installed with my RH9
and postfix. They
all seem to work
OK, now I have spamassassin, clamav, amavisd-new installed with my RH9 and
postfix. They
all seem to work fine together. Lots of spam are stopped now.
But still some are remaining. What can I do to improve its performance, please?
Hi,
I noticed the other day that the latest version of spamass-milter (I don't
know how long the feature has been there) has a cmd line option to block
mail that exceeds a certain score so this might help you if you are running
sendmail.
What I'd really like to do is to be able to define a separa
At 03:39 PM 11/2/2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
Looking at the whois records for Deny.org, and some usenet postings, James
works for isdn.net, and ISP in TN, USA.
Self clarification, it appears James worked for isdn.net at the time. I
have no idea if James still works there, or to what degree he repre
At 03:08 PM 11/2/2004, jdow wrote:
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 01:24 PM 11/2/2004 +, Moussa Fall wrote:
> >Thank you, Martin and Duncan!
> >Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix.
> >Maybe I can use Mailscanner.
>
> Regardless of objections to us
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 01:24 PM 11/2/2004 +, Moussa Fall wrote:
> >Thank you, Martin and Duncan!
> >Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix.
> >Maybe I can use Mailscanner.
>
> Regardless of objections to using MailScanner with postfix (not
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 18:54, Moussa Fall wrote:
> Thank you, Martin and Duncan!
> Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix.
> Maybe I can use Mailscanner.
if you use MailScanner then you can specify in MailScanner configuration
to Discard the Spam Mails or simply store
At 01:24 PM 11/2/2004 +, Moussa Fall wrote:
Thank you, Martin and Duncan!
Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix.
Maybe I can use Mailscanner.
Regardless of objections to using MailScanner with postfix (not supported
by the postfix guys, but does seem to work for
Duncan Hill wrote:
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 13:24, Moussa Fall might have typed:
Thank you, Martin and Duncan!
Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix.
Maybe I can use Mailscanner.
The folks on the postfix list will thwack you if you use mailscanner, as it
apparen
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 13:24, Moussa Fall might have typed:
> Thank you, Martin and Duncan!
> Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix.
> Maybe I can use Mailscanner.
The folks on the postfix list will thwack you if you use mailscanner, as it
apparently uses unsu
Thank you, Martin and Duncan!
Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix.
Maybe I can use Mailscanner.
On 2 Nov 2004 at 12:53, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Moussa Fall wrote:
> > Question from a newbie: can anyone point me to a location where I can find
> > out to make
>
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 12:33, Moussa Fall might have typed:
> Question from a newbie: can anyone point me to a location where I can find
> out to make spamassassin automatically reject spam? I noticed that all
> tagged spam are really spams and I do not want users to receive mail with
> scores
13 matches
Mail list logo
