Re: AWL annoyance

2005-10-12 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:27 AM 10/12/2005, Leandro \(uyuyuy\) wrote: How I can unsubscribe this list ?! Read the message headers: list-unsubscribe: In the future, check for that header on messages from other lists. This is the RFC standard way for lists to advertise how to unsubscrib

Re: AWL annoyance

2005-10-12 Thread Matt Kettler
At 09:46 AM 10/12/2005, mouss wrote: now that you say it! I have checked my awl and found an entry with ip='none'. (running sa with -D -t showed this). This entry had a very negative score. where do such entries come from (I mean IP='none')? I had a missing entry in my trust path that I fixed l

Re: AWL annoyance

2005-10-12 Thread Leandro \(uyuyuy\)
How I can unsubscribe this list ?! - Original Message - From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:46 AM Subject: Re: AWL annoyance Matt Kettler a écrit : mouss wrote: some

Re: AWL annoyance

2005-10-12 Thread mouss
Matt Kettler a écrit : mouss wrote: some spams use the recipient address as their From header. This causes AWL to put a significant negative score. It shouldn't. Is your trusted_networks set correctly? In general the AWL should look at the first-untrusted IP address for the message i

Re: AWL annoyance

2005-10-11 Thread Matt Kettler
mouss wrote: > > some spams use the recipient address as their From header. This causes > AWL to put a significant negative score. It shouldn't. Is your trusted_networks set correctly? In general the AWL should look at the first-untrusted IP address for the message in addition to the from addres

Re: AWL Annoyance

2005-10-10 Thread satalk
I use a procmail recipe to catch these annoying emails. :0 fH * ^To:.*\" * [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ * ^To:.*USERNAME@ * ! ^To:.*\".*(USER_SURNAME)\" * ^X-Spam-Status: No, score=[0-9][0-9]?[0-9]?\.[0-9]? \/.* | formail -I"X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=99.3 $MATCH" Anthony

Re: AWL annoyance

2005-10-10 Thread mouss
Michael Monnerie a écrit : On Montag, 10. Oktober 2005 01:14 mouss wrote: some spams use the recipient address as their From header. This causes AWL to put a significant negative score. Is there any way to fight these (other than disabling awl)? Yes, install and check SPF. This makes

Re: AWL annoyance

2005-10-10 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Montag, 10. Oktober 2005 01:14 mouss wrote: > some spams use the recipient address as their From header. This > causes AWL to put a significant negative score. > Is there any way to fight these (other than disabling awl)? Yes, install and check SPF. This makes it impossible to spoof the sender