At 04:55 PM 1/8/2005, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Thanks Matt,
So talking statistically, does it mean I have to train SA about 'ham' as many
as 'spam'? Right now, I train SA mostly on spams.
Ideally, yes.
( Personally, my understanding of statistics would say that real-world
ratios would be ideal, but D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 22:55 schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
> On Sunday 09 January 2005 04:47 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
[..]
> > Train spam as spam, train ham as ham. Let the statistics deal with the
> > overlap. By trying to avoid training "spamish" ham o
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: A very long spam
I try to train as much HAM as I can but I don't think it's possible to
train HAM/SPAM equally as 90% of incoming email is SPAM.
On Jan 8, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
At 04:34 AM 1/9/2005 +0700, you wrote:
Hi
I try to train as much HAM as I can but I don't think it's possible to
train HAM/SPAM equally as 90% of incoming email is SPAM.
On Jan 8, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
At 04:34 AM 1/9/2005 +0700, you wrote:
Hi all,
Greetings. I've just joined the list.
I've been using sa-learn with SA 2
On Sunday 09 January 2005 04:47 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 04:34 AM 1/9/2005 +0700, you wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >Greetings. I've just joined the list.
> >
> >I've been using sa-learn with SA 2.64 and 3.0.2
> >One thing is bugging me though. Is it safe to teach SA on a very long spam
> >such as the st
At 04:34 AM 1/9/2005 +0700, you wrote:
Hi all,
Greetings. I've just joined the list.
I've been using sa-learn with SA 2.64 and 3.0.2
One thing is bugging me though. Is it safe to teach SA on a very long spam
such as the stock report spam? Will it cause many False Positive?
Why would you think it wo
