On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:24:46 +0300
Reio Remma wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm curious, if I turn on DCC learning, does it learn with both the
> learn and report options to sa-learn or only report?
There are two types of DCC test, most people only use the free version
which is purely a bulk mail test.
On 15.06.18 16:24, Reio Remma wrote:
I'm curious, if I turn on DCC learning, does it learn with both the
learn and report options to sa-learn or only report?
sa-learn only trains bayes.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail
Irina said:
Hi Irina,
> Thank you all for answering me.
>
> I found one link that may be very interesting
> (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets)
>
> Next, I thought if there is a place for automatic uploading rules, then may
> be notifying me and I would reload SA. That is what I
Hallo und guten Morgen jdow,
Heute (am 08.06.2005 - 03:42 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
> I think it comes from Yiddish.
maybe ;) ... long time ago
kiebitzen = in German = ueber die Schulter schauen - jemand was
abgucken
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867
P
From: "Irina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello Joanne,
> I am not really sure what you meant by
> kibitz the SARE process
>
> Sorry, English is not my native language and some words don't go together.
Kibitz is what onlookers do behind the chess player's backs second
guessing their efforts. I thi
Irina wrote:
We don't use SURBL network tests because we use RBL lists from mail server
itself.
SURBL works differently. Most RBLs are designed to check the sending
server (usually by IP address). SURBLs look at links embedded in the
messages themselves.
For example, if I include a link t
Irina wrote:
I also have NOT used Bayes. Don't know how safe it is. Would I just submit
a spam message and I don't have to anything else, or ham the same way? Not
sure.
Some people have problems with Bayes, but many find that it does help a
lot. It does require you to train it with both sp
nt: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: A question
> From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Irina wrote:
> >
> > >Thank you all for answering me.
> > >
> > >I found one link that may be very interesting
> > >(http:
c:
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: A question
> Irina wrote:
>
> >Thank you all for answering me.
> >
> >I found one link that may be very interesting
> >(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets)
> >
> >
> >
> >I
jdow wrote:
From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Irina wrote:
Thank you all for answering me.
I found one link that may be very interesting
(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets)
I first should mention, I am a new SUBSCRIBER, not a new user to SA. I
h
From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Irina wrote:
>
> >Thank you all for answering me.
> >
> >I found one link that may be very interesting
> >(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets)
> >
> >
> >
> >I first should mention, I am a new SUBSCRIBER, not a new user to SA. I
have
>
Irina wrote:
Thank you all for answering me.
I found one link that may be very interesting
(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets)
I first should mention, I am a new SUBSCRIBER, not a new user to SA. I have
been using it for a couple of years. Over that period I have created
t
Irina Kalachnikova
Systems Programmer
NetAccess Systems Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Irina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:40 PM
Subject:
Irina wrote:
> Hello at SA list.
>
> I am a new subscriber - don't get angry if I did something wrong :-)
>
>
> 1. Is there any place and/or are there any tools that are available
> for updating SA rules automatically (on FreeBSD)?
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
Note:
>>Is there a possibility that in default Exim setups, or default
>>OS-specific Exim packages, the exiscan config lines are being inserted
>>*without* the required message size limits, thereby allowing massive
>>emails to be scanned by SpamAssassin? that would inflate scanner
>>sizes nonlinearl
Craig Jackson wrote:
Is there a possibility that in default Exim setups, or default
OS-specific Exim packages, the exiscan config lines are being
inserted *without* the required message size limits, thereby
allowing massive emails to be scanned by SpamAssassin? that
would inflate scanner sizes n
Justin Mason wrote:
It appears that Exiscan has now become part of Exim by default,
and it also appears that (at least in the default exiscan patch)
it doesn't modify the config files directly to add itself to
the MTA's flow.
This is correct. The shipped configuration file doesn't include any
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recently we've been seeing a *lot* of Exim users asking questions
(here and on IRC) about spamd chewing up massive quantities of
RAM.
It appears that Exiscan has now become part of Exim by default,
and it also appears that (at l
18 matches
Mail list logo
