On Fre, 2011-02-25 at 08:50 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:57:39 +
> Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > However, the thing I hadn't seen before is that its IP, 208.115.216.98
> > resolves to 98-216-115-208.static.reverse.lstn.net
>
> > So, is this a normal, expected reverse
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:57:39 +
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> However, the thing I hadn't seen before is that its IP, 208.115.216.98
> resolves to 98-216-115-208.static.reverse.lstn.net
> So, is this a normal, expected reverse DNS result that I just haven't
> seen before or is it intended to trick
