Re: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-19 Thread mouss
Yousef Raffah a écrit : > Received: from emailmarketingmasters.com (i538754C0.versanet.de > [83.135.84.192]) by kansai.savoladns.com (Postfix) with SMTP id > 7B42810073 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:43:21 +0300 (AST) you could - use njabl's dynablock to block the client (83.135.84.1

Re: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-19 Thread mouss
Evan Platt a écrit : > At 10:48 PM 2/17/2006, you wrote: > >> Today I got a spam message which seems, at least for a newbie like me, >> succeeded in passing SA for some reason! >> >> I'm calling SA through amavisd-new and have my Rules Du Jour updated >> (manual updates so far) >> >> I would like

RE: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread Yousef Raffah
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 08:30 +0300, Yousef Raffah wrote: > On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 17:13 -0700, Gary V wrote: > > > > > > A knowledge of history and a good BAYES + digest tests (DCC, Razor, > > >and Pyzor) will kill these. > > > > > > As far as I know, net tests are the way to catch these. So if

RE: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread Yousef Raffah
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 17:13 -0700, Gary V wrote: > > A knowledge of history and a good BAYES + digest tests (DCC, Razor, >and Pyzor) will kill these. > > As far as I know, net tests are the way to catch these. So if you >aren't running the URIBLs and digests, you won't ever get them (though

RE: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread Yousef Raffah
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 09:53 -0700, Gary V wrote: > >On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:45 -0700, Gary V wrote: > > > Without the entire > > > message I don't think anyone can determine if there is some problem > > > with > > > your system, or if this particular spam simply scored low because the > > > spamme

RE: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread Gary V
A knowledge of history and a good BAYES + digest tests (DCC, Razor, and Pyzor) will kill these. As far as I know, net tests are the way to catch these. So if you aren't running the URIBLs and digests, you won't ever get them (though MTA RBLs to kill off zombie delivery will work

RE: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread Gary V
A knowledge of history and a good BAYES + digest tests (DCC, Razor, and Pyzor) will kill these. As far as I know, net tests are the way to catch these. So if you aren't running the URIBLs and digests, you won't ever get them (though MTA RBLs to kill off zombie delivery will work

RE: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread List Mail User
>... >>On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:45 -0700, Gary V wrote: >> > Without the entire >> > message I don't think anyone can determine if there is some problem >> > with >> > your system, or if this particular spam simply scored low because the >> > spammer is good at what they do. BTW, it is helpful to s

RE: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread Gary V
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:45 -0700, Gary V wrote: > Without the entire > message I don't think anyone can determine if there is some problem > with > your system, or if this particular spam simply scored low because the > spammer is good at what they do. BTW, it is helpful to see what rules > hit.

RE: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread Yousef Raffah
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:45 -0700, Gary V wrote: > Without the entire > message I don't think anyone can determine if there is some problem > with > your system, or if this particular spam simply scored low because the > spammer is good at what they do. BTW, it is helpful to see what rules > hit

RE: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread Gary V
Today I got a spam message which seems, at least for a newbie like me, succeeded in passing SA for some reason! I'm calling SA through amavisd-new and have my Rules Du Jour updated (manual updates so far) I would like to block such messages therefore, I'm seeking your kind assistance in determi

Re: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread Yousef Raffah
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:05 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Youzef, > Hello Wolfgang > I am suggesting something that has been discussed controversially in the past: > dont let the mail even reach SA > I would assume that mail reaching my mailserver and saying it is from my > domain >

Re: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-18 Thread hamann . w
Hi Youzef, I am suggesting something that has been discussed controversially in the past: dont let the mail even reach SA I would assume that mail reaching my mailserver and saying it is from my domain would be mail submitted by one of my users, so I have changed the MTA to require authentic

Re: A Spam Message That Got Through!

2006-02-17 Thread Evan Platt
At 10:48 PM 2/17/2006, you wrote: Today I got a spam message which seems, at least for a newbie like me, succeeded in passing SA for some reason! I'm calling SA through amavisd-new and have my Rules Du Jour updated (manual updates so far) I would like to block such messages therefore, I'm seeki