Re: [sa] Re: Non scoring 'Bank Deposit' spam

2009-09-14 Thread Charles Gregory
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote: Clearly not - but then, using Spamassassin as a filter ensures just about everything gets through CUNTFACE. Congratulations! You've done something I have very rarely seen on any internet forum. You've gotten everyone to AGREE on something! I also agre

Re: [sa] Re: Non scoring 'Bank Deposit' spam

2009-09-14 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Charles Gregory wrote: On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote: {childish rant snipped} Congratulations! You've done something I have very rarely seen on any internet forum. You've gotten everyone to AGREE on something! I also agree: +1 Ban "Clunk". Public warning

Re: [sa] Re: Non scoring 'Bank Deposit' spam

2009-09-14 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- "Charles Gregory" wrote: | On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote: | > Clearly not - but then, using Spamassassin as a filter ensures just | > about everything gets through CUNTFACE. | | Congratulations! You've done something I have very rarely seen | on any internet forum. You've gott