Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate emails and increased spam getting through

2007-10-02 Thread Justin Mason
upgrade, this bug was fixed in 3.2.0. --j. Steve Ingraham writes: > More information: Below are a few lines from the > /var/log/qmail/spamd/current file. This information does not look good > but I do not know what it means. Can someone give me some idea of what > this means and what I should

RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate emails and increased spam getting through

2007-10-02 Thread Steve Ingraham
More information: Below are a few lines from the /var/log/qmail/spamd/current file. This information does not look good but I do not know what it means. Can someone give me some idea of what this means and what I should be looking at? @4000470285c9110f939c [19049] warn: prefork: select ret

RE: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails

2006-09-28 Thread Steve Ingraham
  Jake Vickers wrote: Steve, in looking at what I was doing late last night, I did not specify the port for the telnet connection. It was my outbound firewall that was causing the no route to host. Apologize for this. If email is working now, keep an eye on it. Are all of your clients se

Re: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails

2006-09-27 Thread Loren Wilton
Hi, have a look at rulesemporium.com There are descriptions of the rules, and definitely you should use only one out pof each set of similar named ones Wolfgang Hamann Be careful there. It depends on what you mean by "similarly named". It is perfectly valid to have 70_sare_html0.cf 70_sa

RE: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails

2006-09-27 Thread hamann . w
Hi, have a look at rulesemporium.com There are descriptions of the rules, and definitely you should use only one out pof each set of similar named ones Wolfgang Hamann >> 70_sare_evilnum1.cf >> 70_sare_evilnum2.cf >> 70_sare_header0.cf >> 70_sare_header.cf >> 70_sare_header_eng.cf >> 70_sare_ht

Re: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails

2006-09-27 Thread Loren Wilton
essage - From: "Steve Ingraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; ; Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 6:47 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails Jdow wrote: Steve, it might help if you listed which rule sets. There are some which are obscenely large and others that

RE: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails

2006-09-27 Thread Steve Ingraham
Jdow wrote: >Steve, it might help if you listed which rule sets. There are some >which are obscenely large and others that are obsolete. Maybe we >can prune the list for you a little. As some have mentioned I may have too many rules. I would like to know what is a must have and what I should not

Re: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails

2006-09-26 Thread jdow
Steve, it might help if you listed which rule sets. There are some which are obscenely large and others that are obsolete. Maybe we can prune the list for you a little. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Steve Ingraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steve Ingraham wrote: I need help with a pr

Re: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails

2006-09-26 Thread Loren Wilton
I want to thank everyone who posted a reply on my inquiry.  I believe Jake Vickers was right about the problem.  The RAM on the email server was bogged down since yesterday when I updated the various .cf files using rules_du_jour.  I had included just a handful of rules from RDJ but it appea

Re: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails

2006-09-26 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Steve Ingraham wrote: If anyone has a simple way of updating rules for spamassassin I would welcome your input. I still need to update the rules as I have been getting a great number of emails coming through to users. Specifically, we are getting a lot of the pharmaceutical spam and the stoc

RE: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails

2006-09-26 Thread Steve Ingraham
Steve Ingraham wrote: I need help with a problem.  Our users are seeing some multiple duplicate emails coming from the same sender.  This is not occurring with every email so there does not seem to be any pattern to which incoming emails will be duplicated and which ones won’t.  They are