On 09.01.25 16:06, Max Erenburg via users wrote:
Yeah not trying to welcome them entirely, more so like other
well-known domains that are commonly seen and will not be
blacklisted (e.g. docs.google.com ).
I will try out:
uridnsbl_skip_domain ct.sendgrid.net
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025, Matus UHLAR
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 09.01.25 16:06, Max Erenburg via users wrote:
Yeah not trying to welcome them entirely, more so like other well-known
domains that are commonly seen and will not be blacklisted (e.g.
docs.google.com ).
I will try out:
uridnsbl_skip_domain
_query_restriction deny ct.sendgrid.net.multi.uribl.com
ct.sendgrid.net.multi.surbl.org ct.sendgrid.net.spamhaus.org
ct.sendgrid.net.lookup.dkimwl.org
From: Kevin A. McGrail
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2025 9:10 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [External] SA 4.0.1 - util_rb_3t
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [External] SA 4.0.1 - util_rb_3tld
Looking to check if my understanding is correct or there is some sort of bug.
I have the following entry in my local.cf file:
util_rb_3tldct.sendgrid.net
I would expect that ‘ *.ct.sendgrid.net ‘ would be
Looking to check if my understanding is correct or there is some sort
of bug.
I have the following entry in my local.cf file:
util_rb_3tld ct.sendgrid.net
I would expect that ‘ *.ct.sendgrid.net ‘ would be excluded from any
URI BL lookups?
Hi Max, sorry, no. That command makes it so tha
