On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 09:22 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Hi Karsten, I did bring this up a few months ago discussing releases.
I'm currently catching up on list mail, and figured recent threads might
be more important than revising old-ish, finished threads, in particular
about releases alread
Hi Karsten, I did bring this up a few months ago discussing releases. Right
now trunk is effectively 3.4.1 and there is no reason to maintain a branch.
When 3.4.1 is released, I would make sure this was the case and recopy from
trunk but do not stress as I will confirm this. We should aim for
The Internet is fundamentally broken. After all that talk about
improving Bank security against phishing attacks, I still don't see
"BANK" in that list, but I do see "VODKA" :-(
The lack of one drives me to the other!!!
On 02/08/14 10:43, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>> > > seems http://data.iana
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 18:59 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 8/1/2014 6:43 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > That's trunk only. IMHO this should also be committed to the current
> > stable (3.4) branch.
>
> In a normal process, yes but right now, there is no difference
Worse. There are alrea
On 8/1/2014 6:43 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 08:59 -0400, Joe Quinn wrote:
>New TLDs are committed to trunk (revision 1615088).
That's trunk only. IMHO this should also be committed to the current
stable (3.4) branch.
In a normal process, yes but right now, there is no
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 08:59 -0400, Joe Quinn wrote:
> New TLDs are committed to trunk (revision 1615088).
That's trunk only. IMHO this should also be committed to the current
stable (3.4) branch.
> The process to update the TLDs is commented in RegistrarBoundaries.pm,
> so anyone is able to do
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, August 01, 2014 4:14 PM +0200 Axb wrote:
On 08/01/2014 02:59 PM, Joe Quinn wrote:
> New TLDs are committed to trunk (revision 1615088).
Thanks Joe!
I just got hit with pink:
Return-Path: harassm...@famous.pink
...must...resis
--On Friday, August 01, 2014 4:14 PM +0200 Axb wrote:
On 08/01/2014 02:59 PM, Joe Quinn wrote:
New TLDs are committed to trunk (revision 1615088).
Thanks Joe!
The process to update the TLDs is commented in RegistrarBoundaries.pm,
so anyone is able to do it.
Wanted to discuss the uper/low
On 08/01/2014 02:59 PM, Joe Quinn wrote:
New TLDs are committed to trunk (revision 1615088).
Thanks Joe!
The process to update the TLDs is commented in RegistrarBoundaries.pm,
so anyone is able to do it.
Wanted to discuss the uper/lowercase re stuff before giving it a try ...
On 08/01/2014 10:41 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
Apologies, keyboard-before-brain - this is a header line - our defers
come at SMTP time
seen in spam uris
kiloo\./blue
kata-tata\./blue
liquidbasket\./blue
edgesphere\./blue
bubblestorm\./blue
pixobox\./red
wrexham\./red
getz-one\./red
unimmortalises
On 08/01/2014 10:38 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
Does this domain even exist?
---8<---
dig jumpclub21.blue
whois jumpclub21.blue
Domain Name:JUMPCLUB21.BLUE
Domain ID: D53127958-LRMS
Creation Date: 2014-07-14T20:15:54Z
Updated Date: 2014-07-29T16:37:25Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2015-07-14T20:15:54Z
Sp
On 08/01/2014 01:34 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 7/31/2014 7:17 PM, Axb wrote:
if (version >= 3.004000)
score URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST 15.0
blacklist_uri_host blue
blacklist_uri_host red
# blacklist_uri_hostgreen
# blacklist_uri_hostblue
# blacklist_uri_hostblack
endif
Theoretically, l
On 2014-07-31 16:34, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Theoretically, legitimate mail could use these TLDs? is your theory
that they are new enough that you are just blocking?
They could, but like .info and .biz, there will be a handful of
legitimate users and mostly just spam and junk.
To me, it's
On 7/31/2014 7:17 PM, Axb wrote:
if (version >= 3.004000)
score URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST 15.0
blacklist_uri_host blue
blacklist_uri_host red
# blacklist_uri_hostgreen
# blacklist_uri_hostblue
# blacklist_uri_hostblack
endif
Theoretically, legitimate mail could use these TLDs? is your theo
14 matches
Mail list logo
