Dr Robert Young wrote:
> Currently, about 30% of the "spam" that sneaks through our setup of
> spamassassin 3.0.4 is flagged as RAZOR2_CHECKED, but still scores below
> 5.0 ( it varies from 2-4) . We have the rules_du_jour script running
> updates regularly, and bayes is trained.
>
> Does it m
From: "Dr Robert Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Currently, about 30% of the "spam" that sneaks through our setup of
> spamassassin 3.0.4 is flagged as RAZOR2_CHECKED, but still scores
> below 5.0 ( it varies from 2-4) . We have the rules_du_jour script
> running updates regularly, and bayes i
Currently, about 30% of the "spam" that sneaks through our setup of
spamassassin 3.0.4 is flagged as RAZOR2_CHECKED, but still scores
below 5.0 ( it varies from 2-4) . We have the rules_du_jour script
running updates regularly, and bayes is trained.
Does it make sense to "bump up" the RAZO
