Re: RHEL7: spamass-milter-postfix==>spamassassin

2017-11-27 Thread Colony.three
> Am 27.11.2017 um 19:37 schrieb Colony.three: > >> Yes spamass-milter-postfix(root) is running fine, again you >> underestimate me Harald. >> So it is postfix==>milter==>spamassassin. But my actual question here >> is how does that last connexion get made? >> >> as i showed you >> >> /usr/sbin/sp

Re: RHEL7: spamass-milter-postfix==>spamassassin

2017-11-27 Thread Bill Cole
On 27 Nov 2017, at 11:58 (-0500), Colony.three wrote: Anyone know how spamass-milter-postfix communicates with spamassassin? There's a postfix socket, but no setting AFAICT for the milter to reach SA. I gather that the mechanism may be through clamc, but I have no proof that this is actually

Re: RHEL7: spamass-milter-postfix==>spamassassin

2017-11-27 Thread Colony.three
itor? > Original Message ---- > Subject: Re: RHEL7: spamass-milter-postfix==>spamassassin > Local Time: November 27, 2017 9:31 AM > UTC Time: November 27, 2017 5:31 PM > From: h.rei...@thelounge.net > To: Colony.three > > Am 27.11.2017 um 18:28 schrieb Colon

RHEL7: spamass-milter-postfix==>spamassassin

2017-11-27 Thread Colony.three
Anyone know how spamass-milter-postfix communicates with spamassassin? There's a postfix socket, but no setting AFAICT for the milter to reach SA. I gather that the mechanism may be through clamc, but I have no proof that this is actually the case. It seems that everyone is resigned to leaving