Re: [SPAM] Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Notice: same mail on Debian 10 Server Rule dont hit spamassassin -V SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 running on Perl version 5.28.1 On 05.02.20 17:38, Philipp Ewald wrote: on this server i have installed updates apparently not enough... Debian 9.11 Server which rule was hit: # damn this soun

Re: [SPAM] Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Philipp Ewald
Thanks for help! Notice: same mail on Debian 10 Server Rule dont hit spamassassin -V SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 running on Perl version 5.28.1 on this server i have installed updates Debian 9.11 Server which rule was hit: # damn this sounds so wrong spamassassin -V SpamAssassin version

Re: [SPAM] Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 05.02.20 17:18, Henrik K wrote: >The error can only happen if there was unquoted $ in regex. > >header __ZMIfish_ForgedBill01 Message-ID =~ /$Blat.v3/ > >Newer 3.4.4 don't care about such things, you should upgrade asap since >there are vulnerabilities. On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:55:33PM +

Re: [SPAM] Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:55:33PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 05.02.20 17:18, Henrik K wrote: > >The error can only happen if there was unquoted $ in regex. > > > >header __ZMIfish_ForgedBill01 Message-ID =~ /$Blat.v3/ > > > >Newer 3.4.4 don't care about such things, you should upg

Re: [SPAM] Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 05.02.20 17:18, Henrik K wrote: The error can only happen if there was unquoted $ in regex. header __ZMIfish_ForgedBill01 Message-ID =~ /$Blat.v3/ Newer 3.4.4 don't care about such things, you should upgrade asap since there are vulnerabilities. the OP reported using debian, which has th

Re: [SPAM] Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Damian
So this must have been an old version of the file, the current regex is quoted. Also Stretch has backported 3.4.4 fixes, but maybe Philipp did not include debian-security sources? > The error can only happen if there was unquoted $ in regex. > > header __ZMIfish_ForgedBill01 Message-ID =~ /$Blat.

Re: [SPAM] Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Henrik K
The error can only happen if there was unquoted $ in regex. header __ZMIfish_ForgedBill01 Message-ID =~ /$Blat.v3/ Newer 3.4.4 don't care about such things, you should upgrade asap since there are vulnerabilities. On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:08:43PM +0100, Philipp Ewald wrote: > >That is str

Re: [SPAM] Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Philipp Ewald
That is strange. Do you have a copy of that file? Is it identical to [1] no really... i have remove all lines with starting "#" sed -i '/^#.*/d' /etc/spamassassin/70_zmi_german.cf File comes from: http://sa.zmi.at/sa-update-german/402.tar.gz linux-distribution package, CPAN, other? Debian 9.1

Re: [SPAM] Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Damian
That is strange. Do you have a copy of that file? Is it identical to [1]? What exact SA codebase is this; linux-distribution package, CPAN, other? > Feb  5 14:19:46.438 [6998] warn:  (Global symbol "$Blat" requires > explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $Blat"?) at > /etc/spamassas

Re: [SPAM] Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Philipp Ewald
or.readthedocs.io/en/latest/)  1.6 REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC  No description available.  0.8 RDNS_NONE  Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS  1.0 FSL_BULK_SIG   Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe  1.0 MISSING_FROM   Missing From: header  0.0 HTML_SHORT_LINK

Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Damian
Can you provide an .eml that will reproduce the hit with a manual spamassassin invocation? > i have a mail with REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC=1.552 but in Mail Header > there is a "To" why does this rule hit? > > From: "Kreditkarte" > Reply-To: "Kreditkarte" > To: u...@another.tld

REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC

2020-02-05 Thread Philipp Ewald
Hello guys, i have a mail with REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC=1.552 but in Mail Header there is a "To" why does this rule hit? From: "Kreditkarte" Reply-To: "Kreditkarte" To: u...@another.tld Unfortunately *all* of the rules don't have descriptions on the web. F

Re: [SOLVED] REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC : rule description ?

2012-11-24 Thread Bruno Costacurta
I'm looking for the REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC rule description. Where can all rules descriptions be found ? Thanks for attention. Bruno Unfortunately *all* of the rules don't have descriptions on the web. For this one the rule name should be description enough: there is a Reply-To:

Re: REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC : rule description ?

2012-11-10 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Bruno Costacurta wrote: Hello, I'm looking for the REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC rule description. Usually I look at the following website : http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html but it seems REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC is not yet documented here. Where can all

REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC : rule description ?

2012-11-10 Thread Bruno Costacurta
Hello, I'm looking for the REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC rule description. Usually I look at the following website : http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html but it seems REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC is not yet documented here. Where can all rules descriptions be found ? Thanks for attention.