Re: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 8.6.2010 22:56, Scott Ostrander wrote: > > On 8.6.2010 22:47, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > -Original Message- >> From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi] >> >> But then no. >> >> It gets BAYES_99 now, but then I think it still does not work. >> >> Jun 8 22:38:00.931 [21328] dbg: ext

RE: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Scott Ostrander
On 8.6.2010 22:47, Jari Fredriksson wrote: -Original Message- > From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi] > > But then no. > > It gets BAYES_99 now, but then I think it still does not work. > > Jun 8 22:38:00.931 [21328] dbg: extracttext: External call: unrtf "/usr/bin/unrtf","-t",

Re: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 8.6.2010 22:23, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > On 8.6.2010 21:58, Scott Ostrander wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi] >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM >>> Subject: Re: word file spam >>>

Re: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 8.6.2010 21:58, Scott Ostrander wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM >> Subject: Re: word file spam >> >> But SA -D --lint says >> >> Jun 8 20:38:57

RE: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Scott Ostrander
> -Original Message- > From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi] > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM > Subject: Re: word file spam > > But SA -D --lint says > > Jun 8 20:38:57.000 [10237] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure dependency in eval while runnin

Re: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 13.10.2009 12:13, Jonas Eckerman wrote: > John Hardin wrote: > >> There were mutterings about a generic plugin that would take an >> attachment, process it somehow (e.g. wvHtml, antiword, ps2ascii, or >> whatever was appropriate), and insert the results into the body text >> to be scanned by th

Re: word file spam

2009-10-13 Thread Jonas Eckerman
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Yes, but generic plugin should be able extract images for later processing > (FuzzyOCR or maybe even things like Bayes) too ;) That would depend on what you mean by "generic". :-) It's a generic text extractor plugin, with the ability to call an OCR program for

Re: word file spam

2009-10-13 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Jonas Eckerman wrote: John Hardin wrote: There were mutterings about a generic plugin that would take an attachment, process it somehow (e.g. wvHtml, antiword, ps2ascii, or whatever was appropriate), and insert the results into the body text to be scanned by the regula

Re: word file spam

2009-10-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> John Hardin wrote: > >> There were mutterings about a generic plugin that would take an >> attachment, process it somehow (e.g. wvHtml, antiword, ps2ascii, or >> whatever was appropriate), and insert the results into the body text to >> be scanned by the regular rules. On 13.10.09 11:13, Jo

Re: word file spam

2009-10-13 Thread Jonas Eckerman
John Hardin wrote: There were mutterings about a generic plugin that would take an attachment, process it somehow (e.g. wvHtml, antiword, ps2ascii, or whatever was appropriate), and insert the results into the body text to be scanned by the regular rules. That sounds very much like my Extrac

Re: word file spam

2009-10-13 Thread Jonas Eckerman
McDonald, Dan wrote: The word doc has a pretty standard 419 body in it, I recall some mutterings on this list about using wvHtml to regularize word docs. My ExtractText plugin can use a command line tool to extract text from word documents and add the text to the message so it is available t

Re: word file spam

2009-10-12 Thread Adam Katz
McDonald, Dan wrote: > Incidentally, if anyone knows how to convince the latest Outlook > service pack to not mung the body and strip headers when doing the > "create new message and drag the message into it" trick, I'd love to > be able to tell the helpdesk so that they can collect proper message

Re: word file spam

2009-10-12 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 12:24 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > McDonald, Dan wrote: > > > > > Incidentally, if anyone knows how to convince the latest Outlook service > > pack to not mung the body and strip headers when doing the "create new > > message and drag the message into it" trick, I'd love

Re: word file spam

2009-10-12 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, McDonald, Dan wrote: We are getting a number of word docs with scams in them. Likewise, as well as PDFs. The word doc has a pretty standard 419 body in it, I recall some mutterings on this list about using wvHtml to regularize word docs. There were mutterings about a g

Re: word file spam

2009-10-12 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
McDonald, Dan wrote: Incidentally, if anyone knows how to convince the latest Outlook service pack to not mung the body and strip headers when doing the "create new message and drag the message into it" trick, I'd love to be able to tell the helpdesk so that they can collect proper message bodi

Re: word file spam

2009-10-12 Thread Michael Scheidell
McDonald, Dan wrote: Incidentally, if anyone knows how to convince the latest Outlook service pack to not mung the body and strip headers when doing the "create new message and drag the message into it" trick, I'd love to be able to tell the helpdesk so that they can collect proper message bodie