On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Seems zixmail has not only decided to bastardize 'email' off the net, but
now, when informing someone they got one, makes suck bad freeking headers
that SA wants to tag it spam. take the bayes credit out and you have 8 points
on a legit email.
Ye
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Seems zixmail has not only decided to bastardize 'email' off the net, but
now, when informing someone they got one, makes suck bad freeking headers
that SA wants to tag it spam. take the bayes credit out and you have 8 points
on a legit email.
Ha
> whitelist_from_rcvd only works for hosts that have a valid DNS map, both
> forward & reverse. This is to prevent spammers from forging a
> DNS reverse map to exploit a known whitelist_from_rcvd.
>
> As your host '[75.145.201.209]' only has a reverse map (no forward map
> for that name) you can
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> "whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net"
>
> is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match.
> Any ideas?
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from [75.145.201.209]
> -Original Message-
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote:
>
> > "whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net"
> >
> > is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't
> match.
> > Any ideas?
>
> Did you restart spamd
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote:
"whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net"
is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match.
Any ideas?
Did you restart spamd?
You might try just
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PRO
