RE: whitelist pattern problem in userpref-whitelisting

2009-03-17 Thread Bowie Bailey
LuKreme wrote: > On 17-Mar-2009, at 10:12, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > If you do not want to allow user rules, you > > can define the rule in local.cf and give it a 0 score. The > > individual users would then be able to activate the rule by > > changing the score in user_prefs. > > > Oh? Well, tha

Re: whitelist pattern problem in userpref-whitelisting

2009-03-17 Thread LuKreme
On 17-Mar-2009, at 10:12, Bowie Bailey wrote: If you do not want to allow user rules, you can define the rule in local.cf and give it a 0 score. The individual users would then be able to activate the rule by changing the score in user_prefs. Oh? Well, that's clever. I thought scoring 0 dis

RE: whitelist pattern problem in userpref-whitelisting

2009-03-17 Thread Bowie Bailey
I did not realize you were talking about whitelisting when I replied. The whitelist_from and related commands use filename globbing. You can use '?' to represent one character or '*' to represent any number of characters, but that is the extent of it. The rule that I listed below can be used as a

Re: whitelist pattern problem in userpref-whitelisting

2009-03-13 Thread Linda Walsh
Does the below apply to the ~/.spamassassin/userprefs whitelisting (command, keyword or feature)... Sorry...it was the whitelisting in the userpref file that I was talking about the "primitive pattern matching" At one point it was limited to DOS-like file-matching patterns, not the