RE: spamc using different perl

2007-02-01 Thread Matthew Bickerton
-Original Message- From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2007 19:41 To: Dhaval Patel Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: spamc using different perl Dhaval Patel wrote: I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed f

Re: spamc using different perl

2007-01-31 Thread maillist
- From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2007 19:41 To: Dhaval Patel Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: spamc using different perl Dhaval Patel wrote: I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed from the Debian pac

RE: spamc using different perl

2007-01-31 Thread Dhaval Patel
d you solve the > problem? > > Matthew > > -Original Message- > From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 January 2007 19:41 > To: Dhaval Patel > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: spamc using different perl > > Dha

Re: spamc using different perl

2007-01-31 Thread maillist
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Dhaval Patel wrote: I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed from the Debian packages. I had a problem with the Net::DNS module a while back and upgrade perl to 5.8.8 using CPAN. This upgrade installed perl 5.8.8 as the default perl version

RE: spamc using different perl

2007-01-30 Thread Matthew Bickerton
;Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2007 19:41 To: Dhaval Patel Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: spamc using different perl Dhaval Patel wrote: > I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed from the Debian packages. > > I had a problem wit

Re: spamc using different perl

2007-01-30 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Dhaval Patel wrote: I figured that spamc would not use perl but I though it might use one of the other things that are written in perl. I have looked at the spamassassin package and see the following binaries /usr/sbin/spamd /usr/bin/sa-learn /usr/bin/spamassassin /usr/bin/sa-update Are thes

Re: spamc using different perl

2007-01-30 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:01:46PM -, Dhaval Patel wrote: > Are these the only packages that I need to edit the perl line to point to a > different > version? Perhaps I missed a dependent script or scripts in another dependent > package? IMO, I'd remove the system SA and reinstall from sourc

Re: spamc using different perl

2007-01-30 Thread Dhaval Patel
"Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Dhaval Patel wrote: > > I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed from the > > Debian packages. > > > > I had a problem with the Net::DNS module a while back and upgrade perl to > > 5.8.8 using > > CPAN. This upgrade insta

Re: spamc using different perl

2007-01-30 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Dhaval Patel wrote: I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed from the Debian packages. I had a problem with the Net::DNS module a while back and upgrade perl to 5.8.8 using CPAN. This upgrade installed perl 5.8.8 as the default perl version system wide. Unfortunately