On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:46 PM, Bill Randle wrote:
Seems to be. I run postfix + amavisd-new (with ClamAV and SA) and the
res size runs around 68 MB. I'm using most, but not all, of the SARE
rules. On this filter box, with 1 GB of memory, it is CPU bound. Dual
400 MHz Xeons and the load average runs
On Oct 17, 2006, at 6:40 PM, R Lists06 wrote:
I see... so 70 meg SA's when running all these ruleset is a good
general
rule of thumb for size?
No, it's a single example. I don't have enough systems with similar
configs to make any generalized rule.
And FYI, those appear to be Amavis daem
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 18:40 -0700, R Lists06 wrote:
> >
> > This is a personal colo box with very light load. 1gb of memory and
> > an AMD XP1800+ processor... old, old technology.
> >
> > The daemons are consistently around 70mb apiece, and there are
> > usually 5-7 running. Low limit is 2, u
>
> This is a personal colo box with very light load. 1gb of memory and
> an AMD XP1800+ processor... old, old technology.
>
> The daemons are consistently around 70mb apiece, and there are
> usually 5-7 running. Low limit is 2, upper limit is 10.
>
> Load average is always 0 across the board
On Oct 17, 2006, at 5:02 PM, R Lists06 wrote:
Frankly, I subscribed to almost every single ruleset on the
rulesemporium page. If I skipped any that weren't "do not use"
then I
don't know what they were.
In this type of config, how much RAM are you running and how many
processors??? Plus I
>
> I don't use rulesdujour because it seems like too much hackery.
> sa-update (included with spamassassin) does it all very cleanly, and is
> supported by the team. (sa-update is newer than rdj, so it's not really
> rdj's fault)
>
> Frankly, I subscribed to almost every single ruleset on the
>
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:59 PM
To: Dylan Bouterse; list_spamassassin
Subject: sare suggestions.
ylan Bouterse wrote:
> What SARE channels are you subscribing to? I just got the
rules_du_jour
> script runnin