On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:50:52PM -0500, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Craig M wrote:
Could future versions of sa-update please be a little more vocal?
Like maybe "no new updates found | loaded xxx new updates | error xxx"
Exit codes
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:14:15AM -0700, Craig M wrote:
>
> Could future versions of sa-update please be a little more vocal?
>
> Like maybe "no new updates found | loaded xxx new updates | error xxx"
>
> Exit codes are not evident when simply typing sa-update on the command
> line...
Assumi
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Craig M wrote:
Could future versions of sa-update please be a little more vocal?
Like maybe "no new updates found | loaded xxx new updates | error xxx"
Exit codes are not evident when simply typing sa-update on the command
line...
It is the Unix Way for commands to be si
Bret Miller wrote:
Could future versions of sa-update please be a little more vocal?
Like maybe "no new updates found | loaded xxx new updates | error xxx"
Exit codes are not evident when simply typing sa-update on the command
line...
I created my own simple batch file for windows.
It runs
> Could future versions of sa-update please be a little more vocal?
>
> Like maybe "no new updates found | loaded xxx new updates | error xxx"
>
> Exit codes are not evident when simply typing sa-update on the command
> line...
I created my own simple batch file for windows.
It runs sa-update.
Che
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:14:15AM -0700, Craig M wrote:
> Could future versions of sa-update please be a little more vocal?
There's a RFE in bugzilla about mailing a report, perhaps a verbose option,
etc. Patches welcome. :)
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"The more RAM you have, the better" -
