On 21 Dec 2018, at 15:52, Bill Cole
wrote:
> cd `mktemp -d -t HappyMichael???`
I'd prefer you did
cd `mktemp -d -t saupdate`
--
I gotta straighten my face This mellow-thighed chick just put my spine
out of place
On 12/21/18 5:52 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
Fine:
#!/bin/sh
cd `mktemp -d -t HappyMichael???`
Yes, Merry Christmas =P
On 21 Dec 2018, at 15:57, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/20/18 7:00 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
>>
>> mkdir /tmp/saupdate-1849156
>
> Never use a fixed path under /tmp =)
Fine:
#!/bin/sh
cd `mktemp -d -t HappyMichael???`
curl -O http://sa-update.spamassassin.org/1849156.tar.gz
curl -O http://sa-
On 12/20/18 7:00 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
mkdir /tmp/saupdate-1849156
Never use a fixed path under /tmp =)
On 20 Dec 2018, at 17:54, Bill Cole wrote:
If you cannot wait 5 more hours and have an updated SVN checkout of
the 'trunk' code, you can run:
make clean ; echo |perl Makefile.PL ; make build_rules
That will leave a proper set of rules files in the rules/ directory.
If you copy rules/72_a
On 20 Dec 2018, at 17:56, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
We've had a few occurrences of essentially the same problem (a bad
rules package due to an ignored lint failure in a nightly update)
over
the past few years. In addition to correcting the problematic rule I
have also fixed the script which inte
On 12/20/2018 5:54 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2018, at 13:41, Bill Cole wrote:
>
>> This should now be fixed for the next rules update.
>
> And, On 20 Dec 2018, at 17:04, (ignoring an explicit Reply-To header
> in a direct message to me!) Frank Giesecke wrote:
>
>> How can I force the rules u
On 20 Dec 2018, at 13:41, Bill Cole wrote:
This should now be fixed for the next rules update.
And, On 20 Dec 2018, at 17:04, (ignoring an explicit Reply-To header in
a direct message to me!) Frank Giesecke wrote:
How can I force the rules update?
You cannot. The "rules update" I referre
On 20 Dec 2018, at 11:55, Marcus Schopen wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 20.12.2018, 12:35 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I get a warning, when updating the channel:
>>
>> --
>> config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule EXCUSE_24
>>
>> channel: lint check of update fail
>
> No.
>
> But it does work better if you install all needed dependencies and
> follow the instructions. Without dependencies it doesn't run (who
> would have guessed?), and without following the instructions the
> result may not be what you expected.
>
> -thh
Thanks, the context of my questi
"R Lists06" schrieb:
> Is sa-update broken
No.
But it does work better if you install all needed dependencies and
follow the instructions. Without dependencies it doesn't run (who
would have guessed?), and without following the instructions the
result may not be what you expected.
-thh
I second that. :-)
Sa-update works perfectly
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:57 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: sa-update is broken
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 07:43:28AM -0800, R Lists06 wrote
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 07:43:28AM -0800, R Lists06 wrote:
> Is sa-update broken or is this just a prolonged and poorly thought up global
> name for a thread?
The second one. :)
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"Do we have the magnitude of P? A slight nod would do." - Roxanne Tisch
pgpZtTMvtHxF9
With all due respect to all involved.
Is sa-update broken or is this just a prolonged and poorly thought up global
name for a thread?
- rh
--
Robert - Abba Communications
Computer & Internet Services
(509) 624-7159 - www.abbacomm.net
Yves Goergen
Sent: Mon 18-Dec-06 23:20
To: Theo Van Dinter
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: sa-update is broken
On 18.12.2006 18:04 CE(S)T, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 06:01:38PM +0100, Yves Goergen wrote:
>> BTW, to make the update work on a default SA in
--On Monday, December 18, 2006 11:20 PM +0100 Yves Goergen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So now my SA setup is supposed to be broken or what? Well, it still
works so I guess when the next SA version comes out, it'll fix this again.
Depends on how you installed it. Or if you have backups. Back up
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:20:46 +0100, Yves Goergen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 18.12.2006 18:04 CE(S)T, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 06:01:38PM +0100, Yves Goergen wrote:
>>> BTW, to make the update work on a default SA installation, you need to
>>> specify a different path:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:20:46PM +0100, Yves Goergen wrote:
> Maybe a Wiki-style of a documentation isn't well suited for beginners
> that don't know the correct search terms.
FWIW, the man page points you at that wiki page for more information.
> Looks like a loose collection of some special s
On 18.12.2006 18:04 CE(S)T, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 06:01:38PM +0100, Yves Goergen wrote:
>> BTW, to make the update work on a default SA installation, you need to
>> specify a different path:
>>
>> # sa-update --updatedir /usr/local/share/spamassassin
>>
>> Is that by
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 06:01:38PM +0100, Yves Goergen wrote:
> BTW, to make the update work on a default SA installation, you need to
> specify a different path:
>
> # sa-update --updatedir /usr/local/share/spamassassin
>
> Is that by intent?
Um. No you don't. In fact, you really don't wa
On 18.12.2006 16:54 CE(S)T, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On 12/18/06, Christian Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> server:~# perl -MCPAN -e 'install LWP::UserAgent'
>> Can't locate object method "install" via package "LWP::UserAgent" at -e
>> line 1.
>
> # perl -MCPAN -e shell
> cpan> install LWP::Us
On 12/18/06, Christian Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
server:~# perl -MCPAN -e 'install LWP::UserAgent'
Can't locate object method "install" via package "LWP::UserAgent" at -e
line 1.
# perl -MCPAN -e shell
cpan> install LWP::UserAgent
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
perl -MCPAN -e 'install LWP::UserAgent'
And you might be missing a couple more.
-Sietse
-Original Message-
From: Yves Goergen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 4:16 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: sa-update is broken
Hi,
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
perl -MCPAN -e 'install LWP::UserAgent'
And you might be missing a couple more.
-Sietse
I think we hit a bug
server:~# perl -MCPAN -e 'install LWP::UserAgent'
Can't locate object method "install" via package "LWP::UserAgent" at -e
line 1.
can someone provide a sulu
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 04:16:24PM +0100, Yves Goergen wrote:
> # sa-update
> Can't locate LWP/UserAgent.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
You need to install the appropriate modules. See the INSTALL doc.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"With our judgements as our watches, none go just alike."
pgpWSEl
perl -MCPAN -e 'install LWP::UserAgent'
And you might be missing a couple more.
-Sietse
-Original Message-
From: Yves Goergen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 4:16 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: sa-update is broken
Hi,
I read in another thread, t
26 matches
Mail list logo
