The rulesemporium site appears to be down.
If anyone has a newer version, it might be good to post it somewhere? My site
for eg?
Robert
Sent from my iPad
> On 11 Mar 2016, at 04:17, David B Funk wrote:
>
> That's the output from Dallas Engelken's "sa-stats.pl" log analyzer.
> You feed it a
Hi, try Amavis Logwatch, by Mike Capella. It's working great here, and
you could run it from logwatch, or standalone:
http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch
It's pretty straightforward to install and run, and it gives you lots
of info about Amavis performance, as well as antivirus & antispam
stati
On 13-Feb-2007, at 09:08, Alexis Manning wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
Am I worrying over nothing? I do seem to get spam only on those
accounts for which greylisting is inactive, but on those I get a LOT
that SA fails to tag, including just about every one of those image
spams with the 2K or
On 13-Feb-2007, at 08:39, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
This is where a user feedback look -- such as spam/ham reporting links
in your webmail client, or the equivalent training for desktop client
users -- can be really useful.
Ideally I'd like to have per-user bayes, but some of my users are
manag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Am I worrying over nothing? I do seem to get spam only on those
> accounts for which greylisting is inactive, but on those I get a LOT
> that SA fails to tag, including just about every one of those image
> spams with the 2K or so of seemingly randomish text in th
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, LuKreme wrote:
Now, perhaps I am misunderstanding, but BAYES_99 is hitting on 5% of ham? and
AWL on 35% of spam?
Keep in mind that AWL is slightly misnamed; it doesn't just whitelist,
it adjusts scores (both positively and negatively) based on previous
history. So the fac
-Original Message-
From: Odhiambo WASHINGTON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 9:30 AM
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA-STATS on BSD
* On 08/11/06 19:15 -0500, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
| Hi everyone,
|
| I've tri
* On 08/11/06 19:15 -0500, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
| Hi everyone,
|
| I've tried on apache and SARE and bsd sites to find the documentation on
| installing sa-stats , I have found the the actual sa-stats.pl but I dont
| know how to go about installing it on BSD any guidance would be appreciat
From: "Alexander Vranken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
it, and got all zeros for every number. Is there an init step that's
non-obvious (I set the config info up), or did this version not work?
You need to specify a time range for it to use. You also have to have log
data for it to extract.
The
sa-stats.pl --help
Then fill in start and end "times". The one Dallas did is much better.
You might have to search the archives for his sa-stats.pl version. It is
worth it.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Michael W Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I never looked in the tools directory b
> it, and got all zeros for every number. Is there an init step that's
> non-obvious (I set the config info up), or did this version not work?
>
>You need to specify a time range for it to use. You also have to have log
data for it to extract.
>
>The default time range seems to be "After today"
> it, and got all zeros for every number. Is there an init step that's
> non-obvious (I set the config info up), or did this version not work?
You need to specify a time range for it to use. You also have to have log
data for it to extract.
The default time range seems to be "After today", whic
Hi!
Try:
http://rulesemporium.com/programs/
Ingo
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Yette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 3:08 PM
Subject: Sa-stats 0.9
http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-0.9.txt
Link is now dead...is this floating around anywh
On Sunday 07 August 2005 03:13 pm, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> I made this patch on my Fedora Core 4 machine and it works if I just get
> stats for the last day.
>
> But I tried
> sa-stats -e now -s '2 weeks ago'
>
> The result is longer output but it's all zeros for all but the last 12
> hours.
I know
On Friday, Aug 5th 2005 at 13:31 -0700, quoth strict:
=>10 minutes ago I ran sa-stats.pl for the first time, and receive the same
=>zero output
=>
=>This is how I solved the issue with my setup (qmailrocks.org setup on WBEL4,
=>SpamAssassin-3.0.4)
=>
=>vi sa-stats.pl
=>
=>$opt{'end'} = "";
=>$opt{
-stats.pl -h for options... However, run without options, it
will give stats for the last 24 hrs
-strict
-Original Message-
From: Ben Hanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 10:42
To: Steve Dimoff
Cc: Ben O'Hara; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: sa-stats
To: Ben Hanson; Ben O'Hara
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: sa-stats
>
> Did this ever get figured out? I'm running into the same problem, and not
> matter what options I try I always come back with zeros.
>
> Debug shows it's processing the log
14 AM
To: Ben O'Hara
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: sa-stats
I've been running it with -s 'midnight' -e 'now'(At 11:59 - I'm
aware that I might lose a minute each day, but...)
Tried -s today-24 -e today and still get lots of zeros.
Ben (H
sday, June 22, 2005 9:14 AM
> To: Ben O'Hara
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: sa-stats
>
> I've been running it with -s 'midnight' -e 'now'(At 11:59 - I'm
> aware that I might lose a minute each day, but...)
> Trie
I've been running it with -s 'midnight' -e 'now'(At 11:59 - I'm
aware that I might lose a minute each day, but...)
Tried -s today-24 -e today and still get lots of zeros.
Ben (Hanson)
Ben O'Hara wrote:
On 6/22/05, Ben O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just realised its defaulting
On 6/22/05, Ben O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just realised its defaulting to running 24 hours into the future
> rather than the past. Is this normal behaviour? should i be passing a
> -s of 24 hours ago to it?
>
Seems " -s today-24 -e today" does the trick!
Ben
--
"The Edge ... ther
On 6/22/05, Ben O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/22/05, Ben Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Timing:
> start = 1119444953 Wed Jun 22 13:55:53 +0100 2005
> end = 1119531353 Thu Jun 23 13:55:53 +0100 2005
>
> Report Title : SpamAssassin - Spam Statistics
> Report Date : 20
On 6/22/05, Ben Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got my first nightly stats breakdown email this morning after starting
> testing the 3.10pre1 version. The report states zero spam, which is
> true (allright devs!) but then, zero mail as well. Did any log format
> change that I need to be aware
Ronan,
Do you have a sample of what they look like, the graphs?
on 6/13/05 8:01 AM, Ronan McGlue at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
>> on 6/13/05 6:07 AM, Bart Verwilst at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Try MailGraph :) That's what I'm using for my servers..
MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
on 6/13/05 8:01 AM, Ronan McGlue at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
on 6/13/05 6:07 AM, Bart Verwilst at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Try MailGraph :) That's what I'm using for my servers..
Google for mailgraph, first hit :)
See ya
Looks good, but
on 6/13/05 8:01 AM, Ronan McGlue at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
>> on 6/13/05 6:07 AM, Bart Verwilst at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Try MailGraph :) That's what I'm using for my servers..
>>> Google for mailgraph, first hit :)
>>>
>>> See ya
>>
>>
>>
>>
MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
on 6/13/05 6:07 AM, Bart Verwilst at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Try MailGraph :) That's what I'm using for my servers..
Google for mailgraph, first hit :)
See ya
Looks good, but I think I passed it over because I am not using postfix. I
am using Communigate Pro.
Ho
on 6/13/05 6:07 AM, Bart Verwilst at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> Try MailGraph :) That's what I'm using for my servers..
> Google for mailgraph, first hit :)
>
> See ya
Looks good, but I think I passed it over because I am not using postfix. I
am using Communigate Pro.
However, my spamd
Hi
Try MailGraph :) That's what I'm using for my servers..
Google for mailgraph, first hit :)
See ya
-Original Message-
From: MIKE YRABEDRA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:04 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Sa stats using rrdtool?
Hello,
I have
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 02:38:49PM -0600, Vermyndax wrote:
> Oopsie... I accidentally deleted sa-stats.pl. Can anyone point me in the
> direction of this script so I can redownload it? Needed to get a newer
> version anyway.
I'ts in the source tree, under tools/
Rainer
another list user, david baines helped me out on this one...
its very simply that your version of getopt::long is not recent enough
get the latest from cpan and install and it works perfectly from then on
ronan
Stephan Paukner wrote:
On Wed, December 15, 2004 9:53, Ronan said:
I actually never knew
On Wed, December 15, 2004 9:53, Ronan said:
>> I actually never knew about this until i was having a hoke around...
>> anyway cant get it to run..
>>
>> ./sa-stats.pl -l /var/log/syslog -H -T 5 -u
>> Error in option spec: "top|T:25"
>> Error in option spec: "SCALAR(0x4c9a68)"
>> bash-2.03$
>>
>> i
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 02:53 am, Ronan wrote:
> Ronan wrote:
> > I actually never knew about this until i was having a hoke around...
> > anyway cant get it to run..
> >
> > ./sa-stats.pl -l /var/log/syslog -H -T 5 -u
> > Error in option spec: "top|T:25"
> > Error in option spec: "SCALAR(0x4
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2004 08:53
Cc: spam
Subject: Re: sa-stats error
Ronan wrote:
I actually never knew about this until i was having a hoke around...
anyway cant get it to run..
./sa-stats.pl -l /var/log/syslog -H -T 5 -u
Error in option spec: "top|T:25"
Error
Ronan wrote:
I actually never knew about this until i was having a hoke around...
anyway cant get it to run..
./sa-stats.pl -l /var/log/syslog -H -T 5 -u
Error in option spec: "top|T:25"
Error in option spec: "SCALAR(0x4c9a68)"
bash-2.03$
i presume this is to do with the per user count but it even
35 matches
Mail list logo
