On 2010/10/21 12:17 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
we decided that we didn't too much care to auto learn as 'not spam',
emails sent from marketing companies, (because the reverse is true for
auto learn ham) thus:
aa_scores.cf:tflags RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI net nice noautolearn
aa_scores.cf:tflags RCVD_IN
On 21/10/2010 2:17 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 18:39 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
See M::SA::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold. In a nutshell, (a) there are a
few tflags that will prevent a rule's score to be used for auto-learning
and (b) the score used is picked from t
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 18:39 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> See M::SA::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold. In a nutshell, (a) there are a
> few tflags that will prevent a rule's score to be used for auto-learning
> and (b) the score used is picked from the respective non-bayes
> score-set.
>
> With
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 13:27 -0230, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> I recall reading somewhere that there is a way to prevent a rule from
> being considered for Bayes auto-learning. I am trying to create a rule
^ ^
> that hits upon some obvious spam that I am seei
On 10/21/10 11:57 AM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
Hi,
I recall reading somewhere that there is a way to prevent a rule from
being considered for Bayes auto-learning. I am trying to create a rule
that hits upon some obvious spam that I am seeing, yet I want to make
sure (for now) that any scores
Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recall reading somewhere that there is a way to prevent a rule from
> being considered for Bayes auto-learning. I am trying to create a
> rule that hits upon some obvious spam that I am seeing, yet I want to
> make sure (for now) that any scores it assigns are
