Re: not scoring correctly

2007-07-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 18.07.07 14:41, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > I'm sure it did tremendously, thanks again. But WOW! Look at this one > where the logs indicate it was scored at 4.441 as I received the > message, but if I login as the vscan user, I get a score of 5.8... > > Content analysis details: (5.8 points,

Re: not scoring correctly

2007-07-18 Thread Administrator
It is not all that unusual to see differences in SA when run from the command line.  Have you looked at what scores are being hit on the actual incoming message (amavisd-new log level to 2)? Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 10:12 -0500, Craig Carriere wrote: I use 2

Re: not scoring correctly

2007-07-18 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 10:12 -0500, Craig Carriere wrote: > I use 256K, but I have a small volume (about a thousand emails a day) > server load. We are also experimenting with the SaneSecurity > definitions for clam which catch a lot of this rodent mail as well and > should lower the SA load. > >

Re: not scoring correctly

2007-07-18 Thread Craig Carriere
I use 256K, but I have a small volume (about a thousand emails a day) server load.  We are also experimenting with the SaneSecurity definitions for clam which catch a lot of this rodent mail as well and should lower the SA load. Glad it helped. Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: On Wed, 2007-07-18

Re: not scoring correctly

2007-07-18 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:57 -0500, Administrator wrote: > A rough guess and probably wrong as usual, but could the message size be > larger than what you have set in amavisd-new? If so then SA would be > bypassed but not when you manually test the message. > Ding! Thanks! It is set at 64*1024 fa

RE: not scoring correctly

2007-07-18 Thread Gary V
We use SA 3.1.7 with Postfix and amavisd-new 2.4.4 and clamav. I received several PDF's this morning even though we have updated protection. They all came from one server, so I did a lookup in the mail logs to find 'Hits: -', that's it. After some more searching on different servers, I see this fr

Re: not scoring correctly

2007-07-18 Thread Administrator
A rough guess and probably wrong as usual, but could the message size be larger than what you have set in amavisd-new? If so then SA would be bypassed but not when you manually test the message. Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > We use SA 3.1.7 with Postfix and amavisd-new 2.4.4 and clamav. I > recei