Title: RE: mcafee-spamassassin-rules
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 3:36 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mcafee-spamassassin-rules
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 01:38:32PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > It's also worth noting that hypothetically, if I was a
> > company releasing
> > updates based on an open-source product, I may have incentive to avoid
> > making those updates useful on said product, otherwise people would
> > do
Title: RE: mcafee-spamassassin-rules
> It's also worth noting that hypothetically, if I was a
> company releasing
> updates based on an open-source product, I may have incentive to avoid
> making those updates useful on said product, otherwise people would
> download my
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:25:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> just as well try and use those rules. However, they were written for
> version 2.6 and 3.0.3-2sarge1 is complaining about those rules.
My recollection is that they're using a pre-3.0 version of SA, with (I'd
imagine) a number of modi
