On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:11:20AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Has URIBL been added to the stock config? I thought it was still just SURBL?
Hrm, I thought it was added in, but apparently not. The rules are in the
updates file though. ;)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"My psychic guided us t
Title: RE: list of rules
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:17 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: list of rules
>
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 06:52:23PM -0400, Matt
On Freitag, 19. Mai 2006 13:29 David B Funk wrote:
> Well, you know how it is, even billions of those electrons
> don't weigh very much. ;)
Yes, but sending them via snail mail could be a problem, though. Just
imagine that post man slamming the stamp on the envelope - could
destroy or reorder mi
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Mark Martinec wrote:
> > it's accually a 13 mg file
>
> a 13 milligram file, that is an amazingly lightweight file!
>
> (sorry, coudn't resist)
Well, you know how it is, even billions of those electrons
don't weigh very much. ;)
--
Dave Funk
Well, now, if you figure that the ferrite layer is very thin and
disks are showing densities in gigabytes per square cm I suspect
a 13 milligram file might actually be rather LARGE in terms of its
data content. Um, let's say 10 GiB per square cm and a thickness
of about a thousandth of a cm. How m
> it's accually a 13 mg file
a 13 milligram file, that is an amazingly lightweight file!
(sorry, coudn't resist)
On Freitag, 19. Mai 2006 03:18 Matt Kettler wrote:
> DO NOT use the sa-blackset rules. Either of them.
I use the ones for postfix. Never had any issue with them, and any hit
there means that SA doesn't have to be called because the message is
rejected at SMTP level already.
But you're right to
Paul Matthews wrote:
>> What version of SA are you using? If older than 3.1.1, consider
>> upgrading to the current version before adding on extra rulesets.
>>
>
> i'm running RHEL4 with spamassassin-3.0.5-3.el4
>
> I don't want to upgrade because I manage all my packages with redhat's
> up2da
> What version of SA are you using? If older than 3.1.1, consider
> upgrading to the current version before adding on extra rulesets.
i'm running RHEL4 with spamassassin-3.0.5-3.el4
I don't want to upgrade because I manage all my packages with redhat's
up2date program and a new version of SA hasn
Paul Matthews wrote:
>> Are you using sa-update?
>>
>
> i'm not sure, how do i know if i am, but i did a locate sa-update and i
> came up with nothing so i have to guess that i'm not.
>
What version of SA are you using? If older than 3.1.1, consider
upgrading to the current version before
> Are you using sa-update?
i'm not sure, how do i know if i am, but i did a locate sa-update and i
came up with nothing so i have to guess that i'm not.
Although, i've found the website
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/
and i've add the following information into a script and se
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 06:52:23PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > is there a list of pretty safe rules out there that I could just copy into
> > my local.cf SA file?
Are you using sa-update?
> I also make use of a modified version of the rules for uribl.com's add-on
> uribl:
Is there a reason t
Paul Matthews wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've just installed spam assassin and it's working okay, but some spam is
> still getting in, I only have like 3 rules at the moment that I added in,
Care to specify which ones?
> is there a list of pretty safe rules out there that I could just copy into
> my
13 matches
Mail list logo
