> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: March 2, 2006 5:13 AM
> To: spamass
> Subject: Re: bayes DBM versus SQL
>
> Webmaster wrote:
> > Those of you you have used both native DBM and new SQL
> bayesian, can
>
Gary W. Smith wrote
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Webmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 11:59 PM
> > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: bayes DBM versus SQL
> >
> > Those of you you have used both native DBM and new SQL
> bayesian, can
>
Webmaster wrote:
Those of you you have used both native DBM and new SQL bayesian,
can you comment on benefits of one versus the other please.
Much appreciated!
I have three MX servers fronting our Exchange box. The fastest of the
MX servers is also handling the MySQL server for both bayes
DBM is fine for small installations but if you need to scale up then SQL
will allow for a consolidate database across multiple machine.
We use it on a decent size platform (multiple front end relays, multiple
sa boxes and a clustered MySQL instance). It works well for us.
For bayes training, we
