As you want a site-wide Bayes, you also need the "bayes_path"
parameter. What setting do you have for "bayes_path" (note it
isn't a simple directory name).
bayes_path /usr/spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0777
OK, is the directory "/usr/spamassassin" writable by the user-ID that
you are r
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:22:15 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
>
> >>
> > bayes_path /usr/spamassassin/bayes
> > bayes_file_mode 0777
>
> OK, is the directory "/usr/spamassassin" writable by the user-ID
> that you are running spamd as? What happe
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:22:15 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
>
> >>
> > bayes_path /usr/spamassassin/bayes
> > bayes_file_mode 0777
>
> OK, is the directory "/usr/spamassassin" writable by the user-ID
> that you are running spamd as? What happe
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:34:49 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the
server keeps gett
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:34:49 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
> > Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the
> > > server keeps getting "autolear
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
> Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
> > keeps getting "autolearn=failed". I don't seem to be able to
> > figure out is causing that.
> >
> > --
> > Raquel
>
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:44:35 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:39:40 -0700
> Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
> > Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the
> > > serve
> In Sendmail configuration I have:
> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin',
> `S=local:/var/run/sendmail/spamass.sock,
> F=,T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')dnl
>
> Then in /etc/defaults/spamass-milter:
> OPTIONS="-u spamassassin -i 127.0.0.1"
Maybe a dumb question: did you restart spamass-milter aft
Raquel wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
keeps getting "autolearn=failed". I don't seem to be able to figure
out is causing that.
Run a message that hasn't been learned through spamassassin manually as
the user who you normally scan as (ie. 'spamassassin'
Raquel wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:30:16 -0400
> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Raquel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I created a new user "spamassassin", with a password. I call
>>> spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still getting
>>> "autolearn=failed".
>>>
>> Inter
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:34:01 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raquel wrote:
> > I created a new user "spamassassin", with a password. I call
> > spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still
> > getting "autolearn=failed".
> >
>
> Wait.. Do you actually have the o
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:30:16 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raquel wrote:
> >
> >
> > I created a new user "spamassassin", with a password. I call
> > spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still
> > getting "autolearn=failed".
> >
> Interesting.. Could you deta
Raquel wrote:
> I created a new user "spamassassin", with a password. I call
> spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still getting
> "autolearn=failed".
>
Wait.. Do you actually have the optional DB_File perl module installed?
(required to support bayes unless you set it up usi
Raquel wrote:
>
>
> I created a new user "spamassassin", with a password. I call
> spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still getting
> "autolearn=failed".
>
Interesting.. Could you detail how you called spamassassin-milter using
that new user?
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:40:44 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raquel wrote:
> > I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
> > keeps getting "autolearn=failed". I don't seem to be able to
> > figure out is causing that.
> >
> >
>
> Generally speaking, that
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:39:40 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
> Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
> > keeps getting "autolearn=failed". I don't seem to be able to
> > figure out is cau
Raquel wrote:
> I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
> keeps getting "autolearn=failed". I don't seem to be able to figure
> out is causing that.
>
>
Generally speaking, that means SpamAssassin can't write to the bayes
database.
The most common cause of this is a sp
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
> keeps getting "autolearn=failed". I don't seem to be able to
> figure out is causing that.
>
> --
> Raquel
>
I should say that this server is Debian Etch w/s
Dennis Clark wrote:
> Using FC5, SA 3.1.0, calling SA with spampd.
>
> Every message that meets the autolearn threshold (spaminess>~30
> <1) results in an autolearn=failed result. Checked permissions and made
> sure bayesian and whitelist were r/w for user mail. Log shows locking
> errors on wh
> > It seems that since upgrading to 3.11 last night, the
> > autolearn=yes|no|failed always shows up as failed (on all messages).
> >
> > Did I miss something?
>
> Generally "Failed" means that SA somehow can't access the
> bayes database to write to it.
>
> Have you tried sa-learn --sync an
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:35 PM
> To: Steven Manross
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: autolearn=failed after upgrade to 3.11
>
> Steven Manross wrote:
>
> &g
Steven Manross wrote:
> It looks like the autolearn is working now.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas on the "misplaced" headers? Or is that a new
> de facto standard?
You mean this:
> As well, the headers added by SA (and me [through SA] for MsgID) are now
> showing at the top of the headers from
Steven Manross wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0
> tests=AWL=0.023,BAYES_00=-2.599
> autolearn=failed version=3.1.1
>
> It seems that since upgrading to 3.11 last night, the
> autolearn=yes|no|failed always shows up as failed (on all messages).
>
> Did I miss something?
Gen
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Manross
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 12:46 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: autolearn=failed after upgrade to 3.11
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0
> tests=AWL=0.023,BAYES_00=-2.599
> autolearn=failed version=3.1.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> While referring the previous discussions regarding permissions on
> Bayes DB files, I would like to know what should be the permissions
> because the log files indicate
>
> autolearn=failed/no
Well "no" merely indicates that the message did not score high or low
enou
Michael wrote:
> When I receive spam msgs I have this line in headers autolearn=failed .I
> tried to look it on wiki but I couldn't find anything. I know it that
> the SA cannot gain lock on bayes database. I checked maillog file but I
> couldn't find anything that was suspicious. Anybody could he
File-permission issue?
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 6:21 PMTo:
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject:
autolearn=failed
When I receive spam msgs I have this line in
headers autolearn=failed .I tried to look it on wiki but I couldn't
"Jean Caron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 04/01/2005 10:19:13 AM:
> You're not alone Don ! hehe...
>
> I was waiting for replies after your first post. Now with this one,
I should
> be able to make some sense of this autolearn feature within my setup.
> Already something is clearer (clear as
You're not alone Don ! hehe...
I was waiting for replies after your first post. Now with this one, I should
be able to make some sense of this autolearn feature within my setup.
Already something is clearer (clear as mud), since I'm trashing msgs with a
score greater than 10, I probably will n
Don Levey wrote:
> Please forgive me if this is in the archives; I'm having trouble
> finding it.
>
> I've just finished training my Bayes DB using sa-learn (perversely,
> when I was trying to collect 200 spam messages, the spammers decided
> to stop sending to me). Now that the DB is usable, it's
30 matches
Mail list logo
