On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, J. wrote:
> > I don't know if there's a consensus or not among listmembers, but we
> > regularly see someone wondering why things are all clogged up when
> > autoexpire reaches the point that it takes longer to expire old
> > tokens than the process that's trying to filter m
--- "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Dan Barker wrote:
>
> > Autoexpire will keep the db size approximately constant, even when
> > your totals get higher. Otherwise, it would grow without bound.
> > Disk is cheap, but not free!
>
> Yabbut time can become *very*
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Dan Barker wrote:
> Autoexpire will keep the db size approximately constant, even when
> your totals get higher. Otherwise, it would grow without bound.
> Disk is cheap, but not free!
Yabbut time can become *very* expensive.
I don't know if there's a consensus or not among li
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: YA sa-learn question
--- Dan Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, dump magic and note that the nspam and nham increase.
>
> -Original Message-
> Subject: YA sa-learn question
>
> I thought I had solved my sa-learn issues by always
--- Dan Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, dump magic and note that the nspam and nham increase.
>
> -Original Message-
> Subject: YA sa-learn question
>
> I thought I had solved my sa-learn issues by always doing su qscand
Thanks, that worked. Does this seem like a reasonable ns
Yes, dump magic and note that the nspam and nham increase.
For example:
call \perl\bin\sa-learn --dbpath c:\imail\visioncomm.net --dump magic >
c:\imail\magic.txt
produces:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 01265946 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 11742
