RE: When force-expire doesn't work...

2012-08-31 Thread Rob Sterenborg
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:30 +0200 > Rob Sterenborg wrote: > > > > > What bothers me is that I can't update the > > > > spam_count and ham_count fields because AFAIK I don't have > > > > information about that. > > > > > > You shoudn't normally touch those in an expire. > > > > Why not? Is it no

Re: When force-expire doesn't work...

2012-08-30 Thread RW
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:00:00 +0200 Mark Martinec wrote: > Rob, > The main purpose of bayes_seen is to prevent a stream of same-contents > messages arriving in a short succession from polluting a bayes > database. I'd say that's more of a bug than a feature since you can only learn one spam out o

RE: When force-expire doesn't work...

2012-08-30 Thread Rob Sterenborg
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Martinec [mailto:mark.martinec...@ijs.si] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:00 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: When force-expire doesn't work... > > Rob, > > > Because bayes_seen was a

Re: When force-expire doesn't work...

2012-08-29 Thread Mark Martinec
Rob, > Because bayes_seen was also quite big I read up on that too. > Since the table doesn't include any age information and (most) > everything I found says "just delete it", I emptied the table. > Although I think it's strange to just throw away information about > previous seen messages that h

RE: When force-expire doesn't work...

2012-08-29 Thread Rob Sterenborg
> -Original Message- > From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:23 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: When force-expire doesn't work... > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:40:29 +0200 > Rob Sterenborg wrote:

Re: When force-expire doesn't work...

2012-08-29 Thread RW
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:40:29 +0200 Rob Sterenborg wrote: > Hello, > > I'm in the process of installing a new relay MTA, and part of it > means moving the current Bayes database to the new server (bdb -> > MySQL). > > The database is quite big because of the bayes_token and bayes_seen > tables, s