mouss wrote:
Kelson wrote:
Rob Sterenborg wrote:
SM wrote:
The spam content shouldn't even be getting through as the recipient
address is invalid.
Unless you don't know who your recipients are, which may be the case
when operating a mailrelay. (I'm not saying that such situation is
optimal..
Kelson wrote:
> Rob Sterenborg wrote:
>> SM wrote:
>>> The spam content shouldn't even be getting through as the recipient
>>> address is invalid.
>>
>> Unless you don't know who your recipients are, which may be the case
>> when operating a mailrelay. (I'm not saying that such situation is
>> opt
Rob Sterenborg wrote:
SM wrote:
The spam content shouldn't even be getting through as the recipient
address is invalid.
Unless you don't know who your recipients are, which may be the case
when operating a mailrelay. (I'm not saying that such situation is
optimal...)
Or unless they send to
SM wrote:
> The spam content shouldn't even be getting through as the recipient
> address is invalid.
Unless you don't know who your recipients are, which may be the case
when operating a mailrelay. (I'm not saying that such situation is
optimal...)
Grts,
Rob
At 06:24 08-11-2007, Alex Woick wrote:
There seem to exist some address harvester that greps message-id's
and other non-address content as mail address, since I get spam to
such proven never-existed mail addresses. This list is harvested
this way, for example. There are already a few message-id
