Please keep discussions on-list.
On 2012-04-23 20:44, "Николай Г. Петров" wrote:
My mail system:
OS: FreeBSD
МТА: sendmail
MDA: maildrop
database: ldap (openldap)
pop/imap: courier-imap
I still have no idea how you call spamassassin or spamc or if you use
some other method to connect to spam
23.04.2012 15:40, Jonas Eckerman написал:
On 2012-04-23 12:23, "Николай Г. Петров" wrote:
If there is a lot of virtual domains with many virtual users in it,
which is the better variant of configuration spamassassin about
spam/ham:
- individual database for each of users
- or the same d
On 2012-04-23 12:23, "Николай Г. Петров" wrote:
If there is a lot of virtual domains with many virtual users in it,
which is the better variant of configuration spamassassin about spam/ham:
- individual database for each of users
- or the same database for all of supported domains
You fo
Peter Marshall wrote:
> I am looking for opinions.
>
> I have been building a new mailserver to replace my old one.
> The new one has postfix, Cyrus-imap, anomy, spamassassin. I am trying
> to set up the bays auto-learn stuff. Each user has a home directory
> on the server (they can not log onto
Hi Robert,
Thank you very much for your detailed reply. It was very helpful. I
just have one question. Why can you not run sa-learn on spam already
flagged as spam. I thought spamassassin would rip out any headers it
already added. If that is the case then what is the harm in re learning
Hello Peter,
Thursday, April 7, 2005, 5:29:38 AM, you wrote:
PM> I have been building a new mailserver to replace my old one.
PM> The new one has postfix, Cyrus-imap, anomy, spamassassin. I am trying
PM> to set up the bays auto-learn stuff. Each user has a home directory on
PM> the server (they
Thank you for the detailed response.
spamassassin wil automatically autolearn ham as ham ? I thought you had
to autolearn ham messages manually (and do an equil number as you do
with spam). I also read that you have to learn about 200 of both spam
and no spam messages for it to work ...
Also,
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 April 2005 13:30
> To: SpamAssassin list
> Subject: WHich is better
>
> I am looking for opinions.
>
> Problems I have with both:
> 1. What is the best method of obtaining the spam / ham. I
> have the
