User to user post... ( I am not a developer)
I can see where this my be something to consider 10 or 20 years from now
when we all have supercomputers in our pockets. :-)
But until then...
I would concentrate on implementing the latest Spamassassin 3.0.2
It is a bit of work to get it working cor
I like the idea, however, I can see this adding quite a bit of time to
the scan on large images. (I've never used gocr so as far as I can
tell, i compare it to other ocr products I've used and they were all
pretty slow.) I had the problem you described, mails getting just image
spams, what I d
--- On Wed 03/02, Matt Kettler < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
That part is definitely NOT safe in the context of spamassassin... Nonsense
looks a lot like bugs in spam mailers, and very little like legitimate email to
SA.
If nothing else, consider the tripwire rules, which look for letter
comb
At 01:35 PM 3/2/2005, wrote:
I've kust made tests with gocr (a OCR command-line linux software) and it
proves to be safe, i.e. if it fails to detect a text, you see some
nonsense collection of symbols.
That part is definitely NOT safe in the context of spamassassin... Nonsense
looks a lot like
And here is the attachment
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
<>
