Re: Sudden and strange SA Score reduction

2004-12-10 Thread Kris Deugau
Yassen Damyanov wrote: > On Friday 10 December 2004 18:21, Kris Deugau wrote: > > I've > > had trouble in the past with Bayes learning very low-scoring spam > > as ham - so I lowered the autolearn-as-ham threshold to -0.1. > I came to a conclusion that some real spams got scored very low and > poi

RE: Sudden and strange SA Score reduction

2004-12-10 Thread Steve Bondy
This should help explain the rules: http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests.html Steve >Thanks a LOT to all who posted back (what a supportive community! >This was my first post) especially to Kris. > >On Friday 10 December 2004 18:21, Kris Deugau wrote: >> Yassen Damyanov wrote: >> > >> > debug: r

Re: Sudden and strange SA Score reduction

2004-12-10 Thread Yassen Damyanov
Thanks a LOT to all who posted back (what a supportive community! This was my first post) especially to Kris. On Friday 10 December 2004 18:21, Kris Deugau wrote: > Yassen Damyanov wrote: > > > > debug: running meta tests; score so far=5.53 > > debug: auto-learn? ham=0.2, spam=8, body-hits=4.166,

RE: Sudden and strange SA Score reduction

2004-12-10 Thread Steve Bondy
> > > Yassen Damyanov wrote: > > > > Hi SA User List, > > > > Here's my case: postfix + amavisd-new + SpamAssassin 2.64 > working on > > a Gentoo Linux box, serving as a mail server for serveral virtual > > domains. > > > > Some SpamAssassin details: Bayes learning activated > recently, b

Re: Sudden and strange SA Score reduction

2004-12-10 Thread Kris Deugau
Yassen Damyanov wrote: > > Hi SA User List, > > Here's my case: postfix + amavisd-new + SpamAssassin 2.64 > working on a Gentoo Linux box, serving as a mail server for > serveral virtual domains. > > Some SpamAssassin details: Bayes learning activated recently, > based on about 300 spam mails a

Re: Sudden and strange SA Score reduction

2004-12-10 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:47 PM 12/10/2004 +0200, Yassen Damyanov wrote: debug: Score set 2 chosen. debug: auto-learn? no: inside auto-learn thresholds debug: is spam? score=0.629 required=6.8 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,SARE_ADULT2,SARE_OBFUPORNO Then the message is tagged "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6". This

Re: Sudden and strange SA Score reduction

2004-12-10 Thread Loren Wilton
debug: is spam? score=0.629 required=6.8 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,SARE_ADULT2,SARE_OBFUPORNO Then the message is tagged "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6". This is an obvious adult site adv. and SARE rules do a good job. But why the score is lowered at the end? BAYES_00. That says Bayes is

Re: Sudden and strange SA Score reduction

2004-12-10 Thread Duncan Hill
On Friday 10 December 2004 14:47, Yassen Damyanov might have typed: > debug: auto-learn? no: inside auto-learn thresholds > debug: is spam? score=0.629 required=6.8 tests=BAYES_00, Your Bayes DB for the amavis install reckoned the mail was -4.9 points.